Crusader Kings II - 2.5.2 patch - NOT for problem reports! [checksum YZAZ]
- Thread starter Anona
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Heh I typed "whiny" instead of "whimsy" in my post a couple pages back. Wow, that must have been a very confusing sentence lol. Fixed, not that too many actually read my diatribes.
But you disagreed that it was his favorite DLC, you didn't say anywhere in your post that it was not your favorite. Unless you're a mind reader, you have to take his stated opinion at face value.
- 6
- 2
I can't believe the hypocrisy here. You're giving your opinion, of his opinion, on someone else's opinion. I guess now I'm giving my opinion on your opinion of his opinion. I am curious though why you feel the need to counter everything SnowHawkKiller says. His opinion is as valid as your opinion, is as valid as my opinion (on this at-least). I get that you like to feel like the smartest man in the room, but we're all just anonymous pricks on the internet; Everyone is the smartest person in the room when it comes to anonymous pricks on the internet.
Last edited:
- 12
- 3
Helpful. I will check the modding section of this forum how to make my own mod.
I may have missed it but did anyone make a list of the changes between the last beta patch and the live patch? OR are they the same?
[QUOTE="Darkrenown, I even ended my post with "Now I'm not saying you have no legitimate complaints, and you can of course have whatever opinion you like, but I don't think you can deduce what the majority of players think from your thread." which I thought would make that pretty clear.[/QUOTE]
@Darkrenown
Here is a legitimate complaint from someone who played countless hours on CKII: why, once a non aggression pact has been concluded, can it never ever be broken? When there are even no family ties that bind us? Now I just have to wait decades until either ruler dies? Conclave should be about more diplomacy and flexibility not less...
@Darkrenown
Here is a legitimate complaint from someone who played countless hours on CKII: why, once a non aggression pact has been concluded, can it never ever be broken? When there are even no family ties that bind us? Now I just have to wait decades until either ruler dies? Conclave should be about more diplomacy and flexibility not less...
- 4
I thought killing either member of the union, or the guy you have the non-aggression pact with, broke the pact?
- 1
Or if the pact is based on a betrothal, breaking the betrothal breaks the pact. This allows for a bit of an exploit with coalitions/defensive pacts, as you can knock someone out of a defensive pact by forming a betrothal based NAP with them, break the betrothal, then attack them before they can rejoin the defensive pact.
Why indeed? I would like a way to break NAPs without killing either party.
Not entirely exploity imho, there are historical examples where such tactics were used, to draw a victim out of a league, only to then use their isolation to gobble em up. But it should come with a very strong dishonourable modifier.
- 1
Also, as an orthodox Christian, why can I no longer declare holy war against other Christians such as renegade Kurdish miaphysites? Can the 4th crusade no longer happen???
Christians have never been able to declare holy wars or crusades against other Christian branches, only against heretics of their own branch.
- 2
I do not believe this has always been the case. I recall the pope Declaring a crusade against me as Byzantine emperor...
- 3
If it has not always been the case, it has been for a very long time. Are you sure you were not playing a mod? Are you sure that Orthodoxy had not become a heresy of Catholicism in your game through a bug of some sort?
I never play mods and no orthodoxy had not become a heresy. It is triggered more than once if as Byzantine emperor you capture Rome in an attempt to restore the Roman Empire ...