Crusader Kings II - 2.2.1 PATCH RELEASED - Checksum DPOO - NOT for problem reports!
- Thread starter JohanLerstrom
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This is a correct use of "Uprising". It's a synonym for "revolt". I suppose "Shia Rising" could work too, but it would be a significantly different phrase (in "Shi'a Uprising", "Shi'a" is an adjective and "Uprising" is a noun, while I'd probably read "Shi'a Rising" as "Shi'a" being a noun and "Rising" being a verb, although you could read "Rising" as a noun in this context...), and would look silly if it happened multiple times in a game, which can happen with this event.
Last edited:
You know more on English usage than I, especially when it comes to grammar.
My reference was meant to be more to the point that the historical growth of the Shia was a long rise of a minority to hold sway over a large swath of territory and so the event should be about a Shia world rising from obscurity. Sorry for the confusion.
I hope you guys will continue the rate of patching. There is much more left to do.
Major bugs to be fixed, much AI behavior to improve (some might say repair), and many balance changes to make.
And that should all be finished before you throw us any news about "FUTURE DLC OMG WE ARE SO AWESOME TO YOU!!! $15 PLS!".
Major bugs to be fixed, much AI behavior to improve (some might say repair), and many balance changes to make.
And that should all be finished before you throw us any news about "FUTURE DLC OMG WE ARE SO AWESOME TO YOU!!! $15 PLS!".
When are the big five bugs going to be fixed?
1. levy duplication (one holding giving out levy again and again making absurdly large troop size to some realms)
2. flank leader cloning
3. AI giving out barony lvl vassals to reduce vassal limit although that does not work
4. AI not calculating holy orders into troop count on map or in statistics so it ignores them and loses wars
5. event troops randomly dissapearing in cases where they should not be disbanded after a war ends
1. levy duplication (one holding giving out levy again and again making absurdly large troop size to some realms)
2. flank leader cloning
3. AI giving out barony lvl vassals to reduce vassal limit although that does not work
4. AI not calculating holy orders into troop count on map or in statistics so it ignores them and loses wars
5. event troops randomly dissapearing in cases where they should not be disbanded after a war ends
To me the biggest issue right now is that the IQ of the vassal tribal armies is so extremely low that it makes my head hurt. I understand it's not that easy to make the AI smart, but if only they could be SLIGHTLY less retarded, that would be awesome. Right not it's one giant clusterfuck of completely random movements and decisions, abandoning sieges at 90%, deciding to go on a trip to the other side of your realm for no apparent reason, and standing around next to the enemy provinces having breakfast. At least they sometime decide to link themselves to one of your armies, giving you effective control of them, but when they don't do that, it's hopeless. Please please please take a look at this, for the sake of my sanity.
Troop AI is really, really bad. Especially when there are multiple fronts.
Example:
AI ERE is under attack by Muslim holy war in Anatolia, Lombards attacking for Lecce, and Muslim uprising in Sicily.
What does the AI do? Repeatedly loads troops onto boats in Ionian Sea, disembarks in or around Lecce (already captured by Lombards), and then walks troops all the way around the Adriatic back to Greece, where it loads them back onto the boat and then repeats the process over and over.
Example:
AI ERE is under attack by Muslim holy war in Anatolia, Lombards attacking for Lecce, and Muslim uprising in Sicily.
What does the AI do? Repeatedly loads troops onto boats in Ionian Sea, disembarks in or around Lecce (already captured by Lombards), and then walks troops all the way around the Adriatic back to Greece, where it loads them back onto the boat and then repeats the process over and over.
:rofl:
Save game please. To see that would be hilarious. I've seen similar stuff, but that sounds simply great.
Does the annoucement of 2.3 beta mean that there will be no 2.2.2 (and 2.2.2.x betas) with converter improvements?
I'd say the converter improvements will come in the 2.3 betas, since from the description 2.3 shouldn't be affecting the things that impact the converter much, since it seems to be more event centric. No map or timeline extensions.
Yes the converter fixes and some more extra stuff will be coming in the next available patch. I've already said this once before.
This is working as designed. Only feudal rulers are allowed to use viceroyalties.
No feudal lords can give viceroyalty to merchant republic!
See what is causing the issue, the vice royalty then switch back to patrician elective.
Meaning that other rules are set to do the same with special factions,
Now either vice royalty overrides them or they don't (in this case they don't) but it is going to cause a lot of issue.
Cause it is the primary tittle. So when vice royalty is lifted, it is going to be mess to solve.
Ok easy replication, give vice royalty to a merchant repulic, play that merchant republic see still patrician law.
Wait now comes the bugger it is set as primary meaning it is the republic.
Election happens, bingo one giant mess up, who does it belong too?
Now this also happens with theologie mercs and other special groups. (that people can't play currently)
So make sure you got the vice royalty properly fixed first with succession. Either it overwrites or it doesn't.
Same as having a tribal under your vice royalty
.Yeah yeah people are usually not creative enough
No feudal lords can give viceroyalty to merchant republic!
See what is causing the issue, the vice royalty then switch back to patrician elective.
Meaning that other rules are set to do the same with special factions,
Now either vice royalty overrides them or they don't (in this case they don't) but it is going to cause a lot of issue.
Cause it is the primary tittle. So when vice royalty is lifted, it is going to be mess to solve.
Ok easy replication, give vice royalty to a merchant repulic, play that merchant republic see still patrician law.
Wait now comes the bugger it is set as primary meaning it is the republic.
Election happens, bingo one giant mess up, who does it belong too?
Now this also happens with theologie mercs and other special groups. (that people can't play currently)
So make sure you got the vice royalty properly fixed first with succession. Either it overwrites or it doesn't.
Same as having a tribal under your vice royalty
Yeah yeah people are usually not creative enough
Its best Drake_Hound redoes this properly in the bug report forum, but if I'm interpreting it right, if you give a viceroyalty to a merchant republic (or lord mayor, creating one?), a theocracy or holy order, those succession laws override the viceroyalty (which means you don't get the title back of succession?). Probably something that requires clarification in the UI (either banning giving them viceroyalties, or saying it will be overridden)
And next patch will be 2.2.2 for Charlemange? Or we need to wait for official patch with converter fixes until Way of Life DLC (and 2.3) will be released?
Exactly you shouldn't give viceroyalty to special cases, like republics etc. If it doesn't do what the vice royalty is about.
(changing laws and successions for none modders and none console users)
I understand why the vice royalty is implemented, cause it is really neat.
Imagine your own dynasty with own king/duchy titles with own dejure etc.
Help those map painters too
(was using this kind of titular titles before CM but my games are consoled modded and cheat games, well the long game I kept updated)
next ... available ... patch ... as is ... the next ... patch ... it is ... available
Ok, I will repharse my question. What is expeected time to get the converter working, a week or two (2.2.2) or months (2.3, until new DLC is released)? If later, then probably we get aslo new EU4 DLC in same time and converter will be broken again.
Last edited:
I can't help but fear this, because it's exactly what has happened right now with the RoI -> CM bridge, ending up in the converter running for the eights months broken in one way or another.