OHgamer said:There is no reason for sadness my friends. No reason at all.
Remember the development order for the original series of games
EU --> HoI ---> Victoria ---> CK
I still remain fully confident that in the fullness of time, Paradox will develop games that will cover the time periods Victoria and CK currently cover, and the experience in developing HoI3 will only serve to make future 19th C and Medieval titles developed by Paradox all the better.
So, rather than pining away for what might have been with a new 19th C or Medieval title being developed now, embrace the news of HoI3 being developed, because what we will likely see during the development process of HoI3 are gameplay elements that likely will find their way into future titles.
Elidioemperor said:I cry for CK2 and laugh at Victoria2 fans!
HaHa!
Really, HoI3 is good! It is glorious! And we know nothing about it yet!
DaPacemDomine said:As much as I'm grateful for any title Paradox releases, I have to say, this is a profound disappointment.We desperately need a CK2.
Perhaps, but Paradox knows that in the end, all those dissapointed and complaining will buy HoI3 anyway.Nimic said:I think Paradox kinda made a mistake with the whole secrecy thing. Now, a lot of players who would normally be glad (or at least not unhappy) to hear about HoI 3 being in development, will all be disappointed because they thought it might have been CK2 or Victoria 2. Every person desperately hoped for their favourite game redone, and that's bound to cause disappointment.
Rhion said:Perhaps, but Paradox knows that in the end, all those dissapointed and complaining will buy HoI3 anyway.
I know I will! :rofl:
Hardstuff said:Edit: Oh God, I just remembered the worst thing about this, more HoIers. I mean you have to admit the CKers and Victorians are the best, for one they're the largest group in the OT, followed by the EUers who aren't half bad. But we all know what HoIers are like. :wacko:![]()
Abso-dang-lutely!Peter Ebbesen said:Are people, who would have preferred an original game instead of a Yet Another Sequel (tm) allowed to be miserable here as well?
Peter Ebbesen said:Are people, who would have preferred an original game instead of a Yet Another Sequel (tm) allowed to be miserable here as well?
Empty86 said:I love both Vic and CK, but I hoped for CK2 more, since Vic seems more perfect as it is already, it's more polished. CK is still a rough diamond in the dirt, with great potential.
Hallsten said:HOI3 is going to be a kickass game, but I'm still a little pouty about not having CK2...![]()