-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hungarian Lord said:
For the posters and description, simple document. For the ministers, send them coded (if it is possible, if you can't code doc will be fine). Thanks!
i could of sworn we had hungary, just another question. are we going to use dokkroka's (i.e. the cia ones) or should we consider the ones hes done as kust basic and not put them as finished
vcarter707 said:
The CIA ones are basically the "default" ones. They're good enough but many could be easily improved. Hopefully many will be replaced gradually.
Lunar said:
Yes, we will use CIA or Global Security descriptions as back-up, but when we get a good description by a native of the country, we will much rather use that.
i personally dont care if there good or not. as long as they dont say something like "VC_DESC;" or whatever
vcarter707 said:
Well we must have different opinions on the subject then, heh. I think having good descriptions add a lot. Maybe not so much for the alpha though.
ya alpha is what im talking about, i wont talk about the real one untill alpha is outLunar said:
I knwo some guy already copied info off the CIA webpage but I thought of sometihng else for my HomeLAnd
Poland
Founded in 966, Poland has always been a country that has endured many hardships and wars. Over it's more then 1000 year existence it's boundaries have expanded and contracted and disapeared even. Between 1792-1918 Poland did not exist. But after it's Russian/Austrian/German Opressors fell in WWI it claimed itself a free republic. In 1920-21 it fought a war to fend off a new emerging USSR, that took over some of former Russias other states (Ukraine/Belarus) the Republic of Poland was formed once more.
Invaded in 1939 by Germany, igniting the Second World War. Afterwards she was left in Communist hands. In 1980 labour protests made for war to brew again. A state of emergency was declared but led to no conflict. Instead it led to communist rule failing in Poland and a free independant state to form. Also the Soviet Union peacefully disperesed from the map releasing the rest of its formoer republics. Poland at the turn of the century is a miracle in transition governments and it's economy is on the rise once again.
Poland
Founded in 966, Poland has always been a country that has endured many hardships and wars. Over it's more then 1000 year existence it's boundaries have expanded and contracted and disapeared even. Between 1792-1918 Poland did not exist. But after it's Russian/Austrian/German Opressors fell in WWI it claimed itself a free republic. In 1920-21 it fought a war to fend off a new emerging USSR, that took over some of former Russias other states (Ukraine/Belarus) the Republic of Poland was formed once more.
Invaded in 1939 by Germany, igniting the Second World War. Afterwards she was left in Communist hands. In 1980 labour protests made for war to brew again. A state of emergency was declared but led to no conflict. Instead it led to communist rule failing in Poland and a free independant state to form. Also the Soviet Union peacefully disperesed from the map releasing the rest of its formoer republics. Poland at the turn of the century is a miracle in transition governments and it's economy is on the rise once again.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Though the United Kingdom was victorious in W.W.II, her Empire that she had sought to protect for so long soon began to collapse just a few years after the end of that War. The first to gain independence was India in 1947, with part of the vast country splitting apart to form Pakistan. Many more countries gained their independence from the Empire in the '50s, '60 and the last large territories gaining independence in the late 70s. During this rapid decline, the pride and influence of the UK gradually decreased, until she was merely looked upon by many nations as a declining and irrelevant colonial power. War flared up across much of the ex-British territories, in which the UK chosed to intervene in many of them, most notably in Malaya, now Malaysia.
The UK arguably suffered the worst during the 1970s, with the economy declining even further, indeed becoming so bad that in 1976 the Labour Government of the day had to seek a loan from the International Monetary Fund. In 1978/79 the 'Winter of Discontent' happened, one of the most notorious incidents in modern British history. Many trade unions went on strike, creating some gruesome incidents including dead bodies not being buried because of the wide-ranging strikes. It culminated in the Labour Government falling, and the Conservatives winning the next election.
Militarily, the carrier force of the Royal Navy had been steadily declining since the 1960s, but especially in the late '70s. John Knott, a most infamous Defence Minister, part of the new Conservative Government, issued in the defence white paper for the new government, truly bad conclusions for the Royal Navy, that all carriers would be decommissioned, it's amphibious forces scrapped, along with many other assets, not including the Army and Royal Air Force, as well future projects being halted or cancelled altogether. In 1982 all this would change.
The Falklands Islands, a disputed territory in the South Atlantic, was invaded by Argentina, which was under the rule of a dictatorship, buoyed by the cuts being implemented in the British armed forces and it's Government seemingly uninterested in regard to the Falklands and it's future. The British however, at least it's public and it's Prime Minister Maggie Thatcher, were determined to recapture the islands, seeing the unprovoked invasion as an affront to the United Kingdom and its people. The was short, yet bloody. The Argentineans suffered much casualties, most of all on land, but as well as at sea and in the air. The Argentineans lost 109 aircraft during the war, as well as one cruiser and one submarine. The British lost two destroyers, relatively news one, though rather weak due to them being designed with budget constraints, two frigates both Type 21s, and both lightly armed, two landing craft, 10 Harriers and 23 helicopters. British casualties were over 250 dead, with the Argentines suffering over 800 killed and 10,000+ captured.
Because of the Falklands War, it is arguable that Britain has regained the confidence that she had lost with Empire, and regained momentum to became a true economic giant, and arguably the most powerful, economically and militarily in Europe. The United Kingdom now holds much more political influence in the EU, it seems possible that Britain will soon become the 'leader' of the EU, taking over from France and it's close ally Germany once Eastern European nations join the EU. Britain is seemingly on course to dominate European politics for the foreseeable future, and with many defence projects planned to be built within the next ten years, is also on course to play a vital role, militarily and politically in global matters.
____________________________________________________________
I wrote this myself, so I hope it's ok. If you need anymore help regarding Britain i'm willing to help.
Though the United Kingdom was victorious in W.W.II, her Empire that she had sought to protect for so long soon began to collapse just a few years after the end of that War. The first to gain independence was India in 1947, with part of the vast country splitting apart to form Pakistan. Many more countries gained their independence from the Empire in the '50s, '60 and the last large territories gaining independence in the late 70s. During this rapid decline, the pride and influence of the UK gradually decreased, until she was merely looked upon by many nations as a declining and irrelevant colonial power. War flared up across much of the ex-British territories, in which the UK chosed to intervene in many of them, most notably in Malaya, now Malaysia.
The UK arguably suffered the worst during the 1970s, with the economy declining even further, indeed becoming so bad that in 1976 the Labour Government of the day had to seek a loan from the International Monetary Fund. In 1978/79 the 'Winter of Discontent' happened, one of the most notorious incidents in modern British history. Many trade unions went on strike, creating some gruesome incidents including dead bodies not being buried because of the wide-ranging strikes. It culminated in the Labour Government falling, and the Conservatives winning the next election.
Militarily, the carrier force of the Royal Navy had been steadily declining since the 1960s, but especially in the late '70s. John Knott, a most infamous Defence Minister, part of the new Conservative Government, issued in the defence white paper for the new government, truly bad conclusions for the Royal Navy, that all carriers would be decommissioned, it's amphibious forces scrapped, along with many other assets, not including the Army and Royal Air Force, as well future projects being halted or cancelled altogether. In 1982 all this would change.
The Falklands Islands, a disputed territory in the South Atlantic, was invaded by Argentina, which was under the rule of a dictatorship, buoyed by the cuts being implemented in the British armed forces and it's Government seemingly uninterested in regard to the Falklands and it's future. The British however, at least it's public and it's Prime Minister Maggie Thatcher, were determined to recapture the islands, seeing the unprovoked invasion as an affront to the United Kingdom and its people. The was short, yet bloody. The Argentineans suffered much casualties, most of all on land, but as well as at sea and in the air. The Argentineans lost 109 aircraft during the war, as well as one cruiser and one submarine. The British lost two destroyers, relatively news one, though rather weak due to them being designed with budget constraints, two frigates both Type 21s, and both lightly armed, two landing craft, 10 Harriers and 23 helicopters. British casualties were over 250 dead, with the Argentines suffering over 800 killed and 10,000+ captured.
Because of the Falklands War, it is arguable that Britain has regained the confidence that she had lost with Empire, and regained momentum to became a true economic giant, and arguably the most powerful, economically and militarily in Europe. The United Kingdom now holds much more political influence in the EU, it seems possible that Britain will soon become the 'leader' of the EU, taking over from France and it's close ally Germany once Eastern European nations join the EU. Britain is seemingly on course to dominate European politics for the foreseeable future, and with many defence projects planned to be built within the next ten years, is also on course to play a vital role, militarily and politically in global matters.
____________________________________________________________
I wrote this myself, so I hope it's ok. If you need anymore help regarding Britain i'm willing to help.
Good work
VERY good work indeed. I was thinking... isn't it Margaret Thatcher instead of Maggie Thatcher?
Once again, very good work Iron Duke.
VERY good work indeed. I was thinking... isn't it Margaret Thatcher instead of Maggie Thatcher?
Once again, very good work Iron Duke.
Thank you Packman 
Your right, but she is also commonly known as Maggie Thatcher in Britain.
Your right, but she is also commonly known as Maggie Thatcher in Britain.
need any help?
I live in the US and its already got a description but if you could post a list of countries left ill try get one or two down
I live in the US and its already got a description but if you could post a list of countries left ill try get one or two down
poppy7143 said:
Thanks. The list is already up on the first page. You can compare this to the total country list in the Country ID thread if you want.
Australian Description
Hello everyone. It looks like a great little project you have going here. I was wondering if anyone was interested in an Australian country description? I know we're not exactly a leading power, but we are an important ally of the US. One of THE most important in fact. Anyway, if you're interested I'd be happy to do one, just don't expect it to come quickly though as I'm a very busy man. Thanks, and keep up the good work!
Hello everyone. It looks like a great little project you have going here. I was wondering if anyone was interested in an Australian country description? I know we're not exactly a leading power, but we are an important ally of the US. One of THE most important in fact. Anyway, if you're interested I'd be happy to do one, just don't expect it to come quickly though as I'm a very busy man. Thanks, and keep up the good work!
Australian Description
Well thankyou for demonstrating an interest in an Australian description. Here is my first draft. It's a little on the long side, though it covers the most important points from my nations view. I can assure you it has been done with the utmost respect for the truth, and with just that slight hint of patriotic bias that adds a little bit of flavour to these things. Anyway, I hope it is of some use to you. Let me know if you have any suggestions or queries etc.
Australia in 2004 is a nation standing at the crossroads. Ever since the first British settlers arrived in 1788, the young nation’s links with the Empire and the Mother Country have been unbreakable. Since gaining her autonomy on January the 1st, 1901, Australia’s sons have fought with valour in two World Wars and many other conflicts including Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan and East Timor.
Australia’s influence has grown steadily throughout the twentieth century to the point where she is gradually emerging from Britain’s shadow to become a true world power in her own right. Over this period the nation’s leaders have been keen to foster close relations with the United States as it has taken up the baton of the new world superpower.
This policy has at times proved disastrous, such as with Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War or with the Bali Bombings of 2002 in which eighty-eight Australian civilians lost their lives because of Australia’s support of the war on terror. For the most part though, it has lead the nation forward to become one of the most prosperous on the globe, with living standards that are the envy of the world.
It has not come without a price however. Australian allegiance to the US has resulted in broad reaching defence commitments that are stretching the country’s armed forces to the limits. President George W. Bush has described Australia as America’s ‘sheriff’ in the south pacific. This statement has caused considerable consternation in a highly unstable region where Islam dominates and terrorist sympathies run rife.
Australia’s armed forces are small in number, but amongst the best trained and equipped in the world. The dilemma facing defence planners is this - should they scale down crippling international commitments at the risk of alienating their allies, or do they maintain them and run the risk that Australia will be unable to defend herself if called upon to do so?
Clearly, there are no easy answers. Though one thing is clear. If Australia wishes to claim a place as a true world power, she must stand on her own two feet and cannot rely too heavily on Britain and the US. This increasingly independent mindset and sense of isolation has resulted in moves to sever governmental ties with the mother country.
In 1999 a Republican referendum was defeated despite popular support due to the inability of different factions to agree on a Republican constitution. However, it appears it will only be a matter of time before Australia does become a Republic amidst growing calls to replace the Queen of England with an Australian head of state.
This issue was brought to a head in 2003 by the fall from grace of the Governor-General Peter Hollingworth, the Queen’s official representative and defacto head of state. A former Anglican Archbishop, Hollingworth was forced to resign over allegations he had covered up acts of paedophilia committed by members of the clergy.
On the diplomatic front, Australia is pursuing a new policy of economic co-operation with China. Seeking to establish itself as the world’s second superpower, China desperately needs to tap into Western Australia’s enormous natural gas and mineral resources to achieve its goals. In parallel with these developments, negotiations are taking place for a free trade agreement with the US. These deals have involved Australia in a dangerous balancing act between the world’s leading powers.
Clearly Australia is at the crossroads. Looking ahead, there are many paths to take, though the best is not immediately obvious. What affect will a Republic have on her world standing? Can she finally eclipse Britain’s prestige? Will she continue to foster close relations with the US, or pursue an isolationist policy for her own security? What of China? Will co-operation save her from communist aggression, or will her own resources be used against her? All remains to be seen…
Keep up the good work folks! Regards,
ENKC, patriotic Australian citizen
Well thankyou for demonstrating an interest in an Australian description. Here is my first draft. It's a little on the long side, though it covers the most important points from my nations view. I can assure you it has been done with the utmost respect for the truth, and with just that slight hint of patriotic bias that adds a little bit of flavour to these things.
Anyway, I hope it is of some use to you. Let me know if you have any suggestions or queries etc.Australia 2004
Australia in 2004 is a nation standing at the crossroads. Ever since the first British settlers arrived in 1788, the young nation’s links with the Empire and the Mother Country have been unbreakable. Since gaining her autonomy on January the 1st, 1901, Australia’s sons have fought with valour in two World Wars and many other conflicts including Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan and East Timor.
Australia’s influence has grown steadily throughout the twentieth century to the point where she is gradually emerging from Britain’s shadow to become a true world power in her own right. Over this period the nation’s leaders have been keen to foster close relations with the United States as it has taken up the baton of the new world superpower.
This policy has at times proved disastrous, such as with Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War or with the Bali Bombings of 2002 in which eighty-eight Australian civilians lost their lives because of Australia’s support of the war on terror. For the most part though, it has lead the nation forward to become one of the most prosperous on the globe, with living standards that are the envy of the world.
It has not come without a price however. Australian allegiance to the US has resulted in broad reaching defence commitments that are stretching the country’s armed forces to the limits. President George W. Bush has described Australia as America’s ‘sheriff’ in the south pacific. This statement has caused considerable consternation in a highly unstable region where Islam dominates and terrorist sympathies run rife.
Australia’s armed forces are small in number, but amongst the best trained and equipped in the world. The dilemma facing defence planners is this - should they scale down crippling international commitments at the risk of alienating their allies, or do they maintain them and run the risk that Australia will be unable to defend herself if called upon to do so?
Clearly, there are no easy answers. Though one thing is clear. If Australia wishes to claim a place as a true world power, she must stand on her own two feet and cannot rely too heavily on Britain and the US. This increasingly independent mindset and sense of isolation has resulted in moves to sever governmental ties with the mother country.
In 1999 a Republican referendum was defeated despite popular support due to the inability of different factions to agree on a Republican constitution. However, it appears it will only be a matter of time before Australia does become a Republic amidst growing calls to replace the Queen of England with an Australian head of state.
This issue was brought to a head in 2003 by the fall from grace of the Governor-General Peter Hollingworth, the Queen’s official representative and defacto head of state. A former Anglican Archbishop, Hollingworth was forced to resign over allegations he had covered up acts of paedophilia committed by members of the clergy.
On the diplomatic front, Australia is pursuing a new policy of economic co-operation with China. Seeking to establish itself as the world’s second superpower, China desperately needs to tap into Western Australia’s enormous natural gas and mineral resources to achieve its goals. In parallel with these developments, negotiations are taking place for a free trade agreement with the US. These deals have involved Australia in a dangerous balancing act between the world’s leading powers.
Clearly Australia is at the crossroads. Looking ahead, there are many paths to take, though the best is not immediately obvious. What affect will a Republic have on her world standing? Can she finally eclipse Britain’s prestige? Will she continue to foster close relations with the US, or pursue an isolationist policy for her own security? What of China? Will co-operation save her from communist aggression, or will her own resources be used against her? All remains to be seen…
Keep up the good work folks! Regards,
ENKC, patriotic Australian citizen