Probably people in the beta.Dude I used the Steamspy thing to look up HOI4 and apparently there are 1300 owners of it already...Have a look yourself http://steamspy.com/app/394360
Probably people in the beta.Dude I used the Steamspy thing to look up HOI4 and apparently there are 1300 owners of it already...Have a look yourself http://steamspy.com/app/394360
Red Orchestra 2 (2011) then Rising Storm (2013)When was the last time we had a good WWII shooter for instance?
Would Paradox have a record of all the sales from different distributors for each title?those numbers also don't take into consideration that HOI3 and V2 were predominantly sold via other means than Steam. At least that's the impression I've had from answering tech support questions.
I'm sure they do, however they've never released things like that afaikWould Paradox have a record of all the sales from different distributors for each title?
1300 people in the beta? wow that would be a huge beta...Probably people in the beta.
1300 people in the beta? wow that would be a huge beta...
Still 1300 is a bit too big, thought they were aiming for something around 100well more people do make for more bugs found, more logic breaking scenarios, more absurd wackiness... so more bugs found![]()
A WW2-theme is NOT a good reason for people to buy games. Think back: when hoi3 was released, there where many games with a ww2-story - it was fashionably. But at the moment, the popular themes are mostly space and sandbox. Thus, a game that is limited via its ww2 background like hoi4 may not be as popular as e.g. the new stellaris brand. Compared to hoi4, eu4 shows the potential for 'history building'. You have much more time to actually conquer the world, if you want, and you also have many ways to do so. If you try the same in hoi4, it will cause you quite a headache. The reason for this is, that its harder to break out of the historic setting, i assume (as i also haven't played it yet).
Nonetheless, there will be people who will buy the game - but it wont be more then e.g. ck2 and eu4. ww2 is a niche - genre at the moment and i dont think it will change fast enought to produce a huge change in sells like the time before ck2 compared to ck2.
Well I was talking to some of my friends who previously had no interest whatsoever in Paradox's Grand Strategy and as soon as I mentioned "WW2" I caught their attention. There's something uniquely appealing about WW2 and combining the concept of Grand Strategy. Probably the fact that it has been rarely done by game developers.This is the biggest hurdle for HOI, I think. The market, especially in the US, was really oversaturated with WW2 games, movies, and documentaries for about 10 years and most people lost interest in the period as a result.
OTOH, there hasn't been a decent WW2 strategy game in a long time and Paradox has become a fairly well known company now, so HOIIV might draw in people who otherwise wouldn't buy a WW2 game or thought other Paradox titles looked good but weren't interested in the time periods.
Well I was talking to some of my friends who previously had no interest whatsoever in Paradox's Grand Strategy and as soon as I mentioned "WW2" I caught their attention. There's something uniquely appealing about WW2 and combining the concept of Grand Strategy. Probably the fact that it has been rarely done by game developers.
BICE already outclassed the HOI4