Core Shields : Claims, Ownership, Legitimacy?

[unmerged(9563)]

I just wanted to bring up the topic of core shields in general. There seems to be a few conflicting things.

First, The USSR. The USSR has core sheilds on all (Except for one), of its provinces. Yet the following don't,

• Yugoslavia
• China
• Afghanistan
  [/list=a]
  
  even though they are just about as legitmate as the USSR's claims were. China is missing shields over Tibet and Sinkiang, Yugoslavia over Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia, and basically all places except for Serbia/Montenegro, while Afghanistan starts out with no cores on its provinces. I think that it should be done one way or the other, either the nations get cores on all their owned provinces (like the USSR or Czeckoslovakia) or give them cores of
  only provinces that make up the homeland of the ruling class (like Yugoslavia).
  
  Also, a few other core things --
  Peru has more of a claim to Pastaza and Mirim than Columbia and Brazil, respectively?
  
  The United States has a core on Bermuda?
  
  Edited : Part 2. Comp crash.
  
  Small Nations
  
  The following nations are in the game :
  • Singapore
  • Brunei
  • Djibouti (I think)
    [/list=a]
    
    They all take up much less than a quarter of their provinces in the game. While, these following small nations aren't in :
    • Qatar
    • Belize
    • Either El Salvador or Costa Rica
      [/list=a]
      
      Belize in particular takes up a much larger % of the province than the other 4.

 

[unmerged(9563)]

Just Noticed : Somalia gets core sheilds on all of Kenya?

 

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by KwangTiger
I just wanted to bring up the topic of core shields in general. There seems to be a few conflicting things.

First, The USSR. The USSR has core sheilds on all (Except for one), of its provinces. Yet the following don't,

• Yugoslavia
• China
• Afghanistan
  [/list=a]
  
  even though they are just about as legitmate as the USSR's claims were. China is missing shields over Tibet and Sinkiang, Yugoslavia over Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia, and basically all places except for Serbia/Montenegro, while Afghanistan starts out with no cores on its provinces. I think that it should be done one way or the other, either the nations get cores on all their owned provinces (like the USSR or Czeckoslovakia) or give them cores of
  only provinces that make up the homeland of the ruling class (like Yugoslavia).
  

• I think that all countries should be given cores on all provinces they should be given CB if somebody els owns it (domestical, not international)

 

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by KwangTiger

[*]Qatar
[*]Belize

. [/B]

Quatar: It is a pennisula and the province is much larger

Belize: It will just look ugly.

 

[unmerged(7924)]

Should Germany have on Alsace/strassburg? or will it only cause french-german turmoil?

 

[Gathenhielm]

No cores, It will not give us anything, and I doubt it is in our future that Germany will declare war against France over Elsass/Lothringen

 

[unmerged(3236)]

there should be some CB shields, north and south korea on eachother for instance

 

[unmerged(7924)]

Yeah, those should have on each other. Norway should have on Jamtland

 

[Gathenhielm]

I think countries should only have cores on provinces that they have domestic support to declare war over. ( the -2 stability)

 

[Kyran]

Anyone working on fixing the map? Since my scenario editor seems to work now I could do it.

 

[unmerged(7924)]

I'm not woring on the map. Maybe KT... dunno thought.

 

[unmerged(9563)]

I do minor fixes... Kyrans welcome to fix the stuff that he sees as wrong, I'll put up the link for my list that I had fixed...

 

[unmerged(7924)]

Ok, good

 

[Kyran]

Ok, just fixed the map, hopefully those new CoT formulas will work when I convert MDS to the latest patch.

 

[unmerged(7924)]

Good, then there's one bug out of the world