PJL said:
On manpower: I think your conclusion is based on that I have more manpower in pool than France and Spain. I just think I used a shitload of mercenaries early on which is really the reason for remaining manpower and lower WE.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
On manpower: I think your conclusion is based on that I have more manpower in pool than France and Spain. I just think I used a shitload of mercenaries early on which is really the reason for remaining manpower and lower WE.
Mulli, i got a message from you at icq 45 mins after the start of the game.
I`m asking once more how much manus did you build by yourself ?
I`m asking once more how much manus did you build by yourself ?
Although ive been saying that i built 7 manus all along (like three posts!) i checked and it turns out that i actually built 6 manus, sub 4.Tonioz said:
I didnt message you right away, it was after i realized that i wasnt getting a reply from Daniel that i started to message all players online.
HOW THE FUCK DO I TURN OFF THAT FUCKING SOUND TO ICQ?!?!?!?!
EDIT: Ok, no problem, removed it.
EDIT: Ok, no problem, removed it
.
Last edited:
Mulli, the direct loss of building manu of same type after one i built is 250 ducats. I noticed not 10 were only weapon, but 8 of them. I thought like Hose built 3, you 5. Then your each of five should costs 750 ducats more, 3 375 totally. Meaning two other built, i came to decision around 3 800 ducats is fairly difference if it was built for once or in two steps.
Russian income without census is 2100 ducats per year. Meaning lost investments, extra minting, i decided for -2 inflation, which fits your desire, so it will be edited.
But i`m afraid next time the terms wouldn`t be so kind, and it can go just AIing, so i hope to meet you in time, Mulli, next session
Russian income without census is 2100 ducats per year. Meaning lost investments, extra minting, i decided for -2 inflation, which fits your desire, so it will be edited.
But i`m afraid next time the terms wouldn`t be so kind, and it can go just AIing, so i hope to meet you in time, Mulli, next session
ah, 5 manus = 3 750, not 3 375.
Anyway i think not to rise deflation upto 2 percents, at least some punishment to Mulli, we have to start in 19:15 CET
Anyway i think not to rise deflation upto 2 percents, at least some punishment to Mulli, we have to start in 19:15 CET
Brandenburg could reach highest of all nations TE (109%) in year 1698 with following DP sliders:
After i announce i have 40 000 ducats, when i had 2.0-2.5% inflation, i got -5 deflation event immediatly. Think God loves who ? :rofl:
Berlin without CC growed to 10,5 MP. Will be 15.8 when hit 200 000 population limit and more than Moscow`s 12.8 MP. I think starting MP of Berlin for this conditions (between 20K and 200K pops) was 3 or 3,5 MP.
Tonioz said:
At that minute I checked Corsica for no reason and got 300d and -2 inflation
Tonio is not only highly skilled, he is extremely lucky as well. A very dangerous combination
BTW, looking back at PJL's sudden DOW from a clear sky I believe OE should ask for more admirals than usual. If Lord Ederon, my sub, does not object I would like to change OE's random leader request 1 step in the direction of getting more admirals.
BTW, looking back at PJL's sudden DOW from a clear sky I believe OE should ask for more admirals than usual. If Lord Ederon, my sub, does not object I would like to change OE's random leader request 1 step in the direction of getting more admirals.
Sure I don't. It is your game, do whatever you want. I'll just try to rule OE smarter than AI would do. That's my roleDaniel A said: