Okey I fixed my connection But I'm banned from internet till next Tuesday, so I'll ask Aladar again to sub me. Sorry guys but my mother's companion is an idiot mule 
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Sure, what the hell - I'll take France... what year is the game in? And what time should I be on VNET tomorrow?
DesertFoxx said:
Great!
Always read post number 1 in a game thread. There all vital info can be found.
Our official starting time is 19.15 but PJL ususally cannot come until 19.30.
Have you tested your connection so we know you can play?
Wellcome!
Sorry guys, Aladar can't sub me and I don't have enough time to get a sub.. so pls someone find a man, I'll die if Porto will be AI
EDIT: Oh and I almost forgot something.. the sub that you get MUST follow Daniel A's instructions
EDIT: Oh and I almost forgot something.. the sub that you get MUST follow Daniel A's instructions
Well some good news as well. Dud will come and play SPA tomorrow although he cannot promise to become perm.
Majoman will try and sub bluelotus in POR. I write "try" because Majo's connection is not the best. We have to hope it works reasonable.
I believe that only leaves Venice where we need a sub.
Majoman will try and sub bluelotus in POR. I write "try" because Majo's connection is not the best. We have to hope it works reasonable.
I believe that only leaves Venice where we need a sub.
Thanks Tonio.
However, there appears to be a bug in the generator regarding siege values.
We have 2 leaders with siege +4.
1 with siege +2.
3 with siege +1.
And the rest with siege = 0.
Siege +4 is a very high number.
I just used your nice leader site and it revealed that in the standard game there exists only two +4 siege leaders (Bragadin and Vauban) and 218 with siege +1 So the ratio in the standard scenario is 1 +4 to 109 +1
However, there appears to be a bug in the generator regarding siege values.
We have 2 leaders with siege +4.
1 with siege +2.
3 with siege +1.
And the rest with siege = 0.
Siege +4 is a very high number.
I just used your nice leader site and it revealed that in the standard game there exists only two +4 siege leaders (Bragadin and Vauban) and 218 with siege +1
So the ratio in the standard scenario is 1 +4 to 109 +1
Last edited:
BTW Tonio, at first I believed you got the worst leaders but then I saw Russia got none. Which reminds me that Saber (playing Russia) last session complained he did not get any random leaders at all. Did he not? Is this another error in (the running of) the program?
Which reminds me that Saber (playing Russia) last session complained he did not get any random leaders at all. Did he not? Is this another error in (the running of) the program?
last session Russia, BRA and someone else didn`t receive leaders
for now France and Russia didn`t receive them too.
That is not mistake, but 1 of 6 chances to get 0. For Russia extremely unluck, doubled.
for now France and Russia didn`t receive them too.
That is not mistake, but 1 of 6 chances to get 0. For Russia extremely unluck, doubled.
Daniel A said:Thanks Tonio.
However, there appears to be a bug in the generator regarding siege values.
No bug, but linear redestribution
I still didn`t make it like gaussian :-(With average 1 siege, there is still plenty chances to get sieges 4, why not
I do not know what "linear" means. If it means that it is as probable to get a +4 siege as a +1 siege then it is wrong.
IMO there should not be "plenty" of chances to get a +4. If we allow +4 siege why not allow 7 in fire or in shock?
Geniuses should be rare in the game. As they were in reality.
IMO there should not be "plenty" of chances to get a +4. If we allow +4 siege why not allow 7 in fire or in shock?
Geniuses should be rare in the game. As they were in reality.
Tonioz said:
Too bad for Saber who is new in the game but apparently got just bad luck.
On the other hand he was in no war last session IIRC. Thus he has, so far, not suffered that much from it.
My AAR has been written (can be found at page 2 in AAR thread at bottom because I edited an exisiting post). Also, I would like to remind about the manufactory edit (see a few posts back in this thread) so it isn't forgotten as it's a rather important edit.
Tonioz said:No bug, but linear redestribution
With average 1 siege, there is still plenty chances to get sieges 4, why not
Bah we want a Poisson distribution.
Can you donate a leader to another country?
I've got quite a few already and I'd like to send some of them to another...
Hrm, apparently some devious Austrian plot ongoing here.
I have better increase my army with some 100k infantry, still within the support limit
I have better increase my army with some 100k infantry, still within the support limit
In theory, both PJL and Enigma are late for the aar bonus.
However, they both wrote kind of nice AARs, and I am afraid I have few AAR bonuses to deal out.
As a result, the Ottoman Empire will receive the full 500 ducats AAR bonus, while Austria and England will receive only 400 ducats. I do reward late AARs for now, but I DO want AARs in before tuesday evening.
Rest of edits:
England + 20 inflation
Sweden - 0.6 inflation for minting/AI war, +100 ducats tech investment for lost investment during the time (I know it's more investment lost, but I'm a nice chap and I know I am not giving you time to bicker about it, so I'll cut it back)
Austria -1329 ducats (net -929); weapon manu in Krain
Chinese provinces edited back to China from Portugal
edit: and offc, BB +2500 ducats that were forgotten
edit2: English event triggered, Chinese provinces edit failed.
However, they both wrote kind of nice AARs, and I am afraid I have few AAR bonuses to deal out.
As a result, the Ottoman Empire will receive the full 500 ducats AAR bonus, while Austria and England will receive only 400 ducats. I do reward late AARs for now, but I DO want AARs in before tuesday evening.
Rest of edits:
England + 20 inflation
Sweden - 0.6 inflation for minting/AI war, +100 ducats tech investment for lost investment during the time (I know it's more investment lost, but I'm a nice chap and I know I am not giving you time to bicker about it, so I'll cut it back)
Austria -1329 ducats (net -929); weapon manu in Krain
Chinese provinces edited back to China from Portugal
edit: and offc, BB +2500 ducats that were forgotten
edit2: English event triggered, Chinese provinces edit failed.
Last edited: