A great concern is the comte of Toulouse succession law in 1066.
It's gavelkind when in the same time, there are 2 duchies in it : Narbonne and Toulouse.
Then, there always is a separation beetween heirs for these 2 duchies, which historically is wrong.
Futhermore, by this time, the comtes of Toulouse has already change the succession in order to have a single heir. So they really should have a primogeniture law, especially with these 2 duchies titles. Or it leads, in each games, to some weirs situations where the south France is divided beetween County of Toulouse and Narbonne with "de Toulouse" dynasty in both of them.
It's gavelkind when in the same time, there are 2 duchies in it : Narbonne and Toulouse.
Then, there always is a separation beetween heirs for these 2 duchies, which historically is wrong.
Futhermore, by this time, the comtes of Toulouse has already change the succession in order to have a single heir. So they really should have a primogeniture law, especially with these 2 duchies titles. Or it leads, in each games, to some weirs situations where the south France is divided beetween County of Toulouse and Narbonne with "de Toulouse" dynasty in both of them.