Compiling 1.53

[unmerged(40707)]

This should be discussed in OE thread.

- Ok for 301107 and Siria, only a typo.

- 301108, same way? as in 301114? no need to be only neighbour of Russia.

- trigger of 301114 is an abstraction. If one of the conditions is fullfilled, OE has sufficient condition for hyperinflation and nationalism.

- OE has already BB reduction events for AI (and one for human)

- for AI combat lists, too much tags is not very good. Don't forget, OE will try to crush all the listed countries but will do nothing (no Dow at all) if one is remaining and "too strong". We don't want BYZ to be annexed too early. Presence in 1419 combat list is not a good choice.

To ease readability, use yellow for additions/modifications and red for removal (if any).

For RUS and TUR AI discussions, use New AI thread.

For Roussillon use BIF thread.

All links are listed here.

Compiling thread is not the most appropriate thread to discuss changes you propose... since it is devoted to... compilation of new versions (and betas just before).

 

[Bordic]

Bugfixes
-added Maximilian II (0106018) and fixed name of Maximilian I (0106011) in monarchs.pfa

I thought it had to be considered as submission. Well, better.

-fixed EVENTHIST3319, EVENTHIST3320 and EVENTHIST3178

Haven't you done according to my suggestion in post 61 of bugfix thread?
If so 3597 and 20047 are to be modified too and accordingly and as I told you only the first sentences are similar in the event descriptions reported.

 

[unmerged(48371)]

¤301108, same way? as in 301114? no need to be only neighbour of Russia.

same way as 301107 changing trigger with add of PER exist

¤OE as according to me not enough of BB lowering.

¤301114
"In 1780, under financial constrains after the Russian war over Crimea, the Ottoman government started to resort to currency debasement. The resulting inflation and the rebellions that it caused ..."

All seems coming from Russian conflict.

¤Ok for BYZ in combat files 1419, BUT for the others and especially the last one, it won't change a lot the 1566-1574-1595 is approximativly OTT max expension, and most of the tagged countries may already 's been annexed by OTT or somebody else, so i don't think that too much tag will be a matter, moreover in 1620, only tag of countries that are part of the OTT in OTT mind, not lots of tags and 95% will already not exist in 1620.

That's all for now

 

[unmerged(40707)]

I thought it had to be considered as submission. Well, better.

Missing monarch after death of previous monarch before 1819 and missing number in a name... posted in bugs thread? Well... You can always submit them since it is a modification but I see no reason to reject this modification.

Haven't you done according to my suggestion in post 61 of bugfix thread?
If so 3597 and 20047 are to be modified too and accordingly and as I told you only the first sentences are similar in the event descriptions reported.

Yes and I will take care of 3597 and 20047 then.

EDIT: I propose this change:
[...]When her father unexpectedly died in 1477 [...]

No need to say it was under the walls of Nancy but "unexpectedly" is not right.

EVENTHIST20047 is a special case:

EVENTHIST20047;Mary of Valois was the only daughter of Charles le Téméraire (Charles the Rash) and so heiress of all the rich Burgundian domains from the Saone River up to the Low Countries. When her father died in 1477 at the age of 43, Mary was only nineteen. The Duchy of Burgundy was one of the largest medieval states in Western Europe, covering most of the Low Countries (today's Belgium and Holland), Luxembourg and Franche-Comté. By marriage Mary would pass the lands of her father to Austria, but what would have happened if Charles the Rash would have survived at Nancy the world will never know. We can only speculate...;;;;;;;;;;

 

[Bordic]

So we go with Charles the Rash? In this case there are more changes to do as several event descriptions still report Charles the Bold. Or if we stay with the Bold, we need to modify the reported text entries only.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

I don't know but uniformization will be better.

 

[unmerged(37697)]

Charles the Bold is much better. Rash is seldom used, certainly much less so than Bold.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Once again, if other "English natives" can confirm what mandead says, this is not a problem for me, only a couple of clicks and Charles the Bold/Rash everywhere.

 

[unmerged(37697)]

Well, on Google UK:

Charles the Bold: 1,460,000
Charles the Rash: 1,130,000

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Well, on Google UK:

Charles the Bold: 1,460,000
Charles the Rash: 1,130,000

Yes I did the same search. We can't say it is "much" more, it looks like "almost the same" to me. English is not my mother language, that's why I'm seeking confirmation...

There is no problem in French, it is "Charles le Téméraire" and that's all.

 

[unmerged(37697)]

Yeah, I've heard that one quite a bit.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Charles le Téméraire : 303 000 (not so bad... )

 

[unmerged(5206)]

It should be Rash until 1477 and then change it to Bold if he lives.

 

[sturmvogel]

It should be Rash until 1477 and then change it to Bold if he lives.

:rofl:
Indeed, he's called the Rash because he's perceived as having over-reached himself with fatal consequences for himself. Success would proven those critics to be small-minded men, not worthy of notice.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

Post #1 updated

I will change "Charles the Rash" to "Charles the Bold" in all texts.

 

[unmerged(40707)]

I propose to add these commmon entries in text.csv:

###################################
#### COMMON SHORT ACTION NAMES ####
###################################
#;
ALAS;Alas!;;;;;;;;;;
AWESOME;Awesome!;;;;;;;;;;
DAMN;Damn!;;;;;;;;;;
DARN;Darn!;;;;;;;;;;
EXCELLENT;Excellent!;;;;;;;;;;
GOOD;Good!;;;;;;;;;;
GOOD_NEWS;Good news!;;;;;;;;;;
GREAT;Great!;;;;;;;;;;
OH_NO;Oh no!;;;;;;;;;;
PEACE;Peace!;;;;;;;;;;
SPLENDID;Splendid!;;;;;;;;;;
VIVAT;Vivat!;;;;;;;;;;
WAR;War!;;;;;;;;;;
WONDERFUL;Wonderful!;;;;;;;;;;
#;
#;

I'm tired to see these action names repeated again and again in a lot of events. I will make the changes everywhere.

 

[Bordic]

I propose to add these commmon entries in text.csv:

###################################
#### COMMON SHORT ACTION NAMES ####
###################################

I'm tired to see these action names repeated again and again in a lot of events. I will make the changes everywhere.

Good! How should they work, just using, eg ALAS instead of ACTIONNAME12345A in each event?
Don't forget the string OK.
Should it stand for "Ok!" or something like "Let it be!" or whatever else?

and maybe WAR and PEACE for Napoleonic events...


EDIT: I have never used VIVAT;Vivat!;;;;;;;;;;... I should!

 

[unmerged(40707)]

See first examples (EXCELLENT, GREAT, OH_NO), here.

OK is already a common entry in text.csv for EU2 texts (not specific to AGCEEP) and text is simply "OK" (same for YES = "Yes" and NO = "No").

List is not exhaustive. Any addition is welcome.

EDIT: entries added.

 

[unmerged(31298)]

new map? what new map? will the new map included with the new AGCEEP 1.53? i use 1.52 but i havent played with it, cuz i dont want to start a new campaign when 1.53 is released, is it best to wait for 1.53?

 

[unmerged(40707)]

new map? what new map? will the new map included with the new AGCEEP 1.53? i use 1.52 but i havent played with it, cuz i dont want to start a new campaign when 1.53 is released, is it best to wait for 1.53?

No, new map will be in 2.0 and all AGCEEP events/setups reworked for it. In this case, there will be no 1.53 (current map). And don't worry, 1.53 or 2.0 will not be released before two months. You have time for some campaigns in 1.52.