Community Decision on WoN/1.6

[PrivateSpooks]

The Automation of papacy as part of DLC and others not having access to it is ridiculous. It's a bland interface with a RNG that you occasionally click to "bid" in, why does Paradox want this aspect to be in EU4 when they are prepared to fix it as part of DLC?

Also on Form-able nations if they don't have their own custom artwork, events and rulers that are some what based on History then it's ridiculous and these features are clearly money grabbing exercises or somehow doing these seemingly meager fixes and additions blew out of control on the technical side.

 

[Labrynian Rebel]

Why Bukhara? Seems like a very "out there" choice, especially since you're only adding three new formables...

 

[MarkS00N]

Why Bukhara? Seems like a very "out there" choice, especially since you're only adding three new formables...

Based on dev stream, the reason for Egypt as form-able nation is to present muslim nations, with iqta as government type, a way to change their government type...
While I am not sure about Bukhara, but probably the reason for its inclusion would be the same as Egypt...

 

[Thure]

Why Bukhara? Seems like a very "out there" choice, especially since you're only adding three new formables...

Why not?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emirate_of_Bukhara

 

[Vanillamarine]

Voted for papacy automation, this feature does not increase the games depth by one bit, classic DLC.

 

[Variton]

Voted for papacy automation, this feature does not increase the games depth by one bit, classic DLC.

Voted for formable nations. Only the 2 last options (nations, automation) are DLC stuff IMO

 

[ero_sk]

Is there any more info on new policy system?

 

[British Rage]

Why not?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emirate_of_Bukhara

Even more relevant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khanate_of_Bukhara

 

[Labrynian Rebel]

Didn't know that, when I wiki'd Bukhara all I got was the city.

 

[TKFS]

Voted for Transfer Trade. Like everyone has said, it seems to fit the most with a trade-themed DLC

 

[Delta107]

I'm not adding any of the other interface improvements to this, as I assume you won't vote for them either.

You see Johan, I guess some people do have the guts to vote .

 

[Great One]

I don't see it in the poll, but one thing that I would like to see included in 1.6 is an icon for EU4. Currently it is the only Steam game which I own which does not have an icon in my start menu.

 

[IIWW]

Imho the formable nations should definetelly be free, as it's too simple. There are hundreds of mods adding it, it's a thing that any moder, even not very experienced, can do in few minutes. The only thing that it changes is that it'd be Ironman compatible. The automated papacy is not a new feature, it's mearly smth that fixes another annoying feature. The rest are completely new things, and as such they should be in a DLC. Btw: I was surprised that colonial nations were free.

 

[Augustus93]

Voting now is pointless, it has already been decided that transfer trade is going to be in WoN only. (Source: last DD)

 

[RNDALE]

Trade power all the way, since it is a trade expansion

 

[rachini]

All of those options...dont make people pay for 2 lines of code....

 

[selectah]

Sometimes I wonder why people vote when they haven't even read through WHAT they are voting on.

 

[8BitHit]

democracy in action everyones vote counts the same no matter how important it is to that person and how informed that person actually is

 

[Pete0714]

democracy in action everyones vote counts the same no matter how important it is to that person and how informed that person actually is

But the decision is officially released now. Why are people still voting? Why is this thread still open.