• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
If it is May, there is no mud present, and 46 German divisions (5 SS Panzer Divisions, 1 SS Panzer Grenadier Division, 5 German Army Panzer Divisions, 2 German Army Panzer Grenadier Divisions, and 33 German infantry divisions) attack from a plain province to a plain province, no river, no forts on the enemy side, no rain, no bad weather... All units at full strength and with maximum possible organization for the present tech and doctrines. *ALL* units have brigades of some sort (most common being artillery).

The enemy has 30 divisions (mostly infantry, some with brigades, some without) of which only 5 are armored... They also do not utilize any airpower in this battle, while the Germans utilize a few units of tactical bombers and fighters...


Shouldn't the battle wind up a massacre against the Soviets? Instead the German divisions wind up depleted by 10-20% and the attack fails. I'm not one to complain about a challenge, but I don't accept that a bunch of Soviet infantry in the open, aside from what they dug-in, with only 1941 model T-34 tanks, could stand up to twice their number of tanks (mostly Panthers and 1942 model Panzer IVs) and 1.5 times their number of men and artillery, who are using air support as well. It makes no sense to me. I accounted for weather, supplies (offensive supply boosts), terrain, timing of day, leadership, HQ, minister bonuses, the attack should have been a startling success.

The combat balance in TRP seems to be very unfair, with it being almost impossible to play as Germany since Germany is a quality based nation and the combat favors quantity over quality. Even when I outnumber the Soviets 1.5 to 1, the combat still goes in their favor, then they go on the offensive with 22 infantry divisions against 12 of my own, attack a province with a level 5 fort, and overrun it. I am left wondering how such things can possibly happen.

I am also left asking myself why no officer can ever command more than 12 divisions when field marshals regularly managed entire army groups. Also, why can't multiple officers coordinate their attacks and thus each manage a part of it, so no one officer is left to juggle 30-35 divisions on his own, but rather just his specific part of those divisions?


It just seems rather depressing and disappointing when the best attack I could muster, fails because I wasn't able to outnumber my enemy 10 to 1. The German style is not supposed to be about quantity, and for what it is worth, if quantity was an issue, any 46 Germans alive could have taken any 30 Soviet divisions, as of 1943 anyway.

I have the same problem in Africa, where a German tank divisions catches a single British infantry division in the open plains of the desert, and it winds up that I need 4-5 Italian infantry divisions to help so the battle is won. If a tank unit caught an infantry unit (with no AT weapons) in an open desert, it would rapidly turn into a massacre.

A challenge is one thing, but it is very disheartening to see a few French infantry divisions (no AT weapons) fending off a half-dozen German armored divisions, and to see allied bomber formations (no accompanying fighters, only escort fighters) fending off and destroying 5 units of max strength German fighters.

It seems to be the reverse for naval warfare. I have no idea how my u-boats have survived this long, let alone how they've managed to destroy British battleship after British battleship, and so many heavy and light cruisers, along with destroyers. It seems to be an inversion of what reality would be.

Not to offend anybody, but at the risk of doing so, I'll say that the Soviet army was basically crap, the only things they had going for them were the T-34 and massive quantities of soldiers. It seems to be contrary to common-sense that the Soviets would be able to win a battle against the Germans when outnumbered by the Germans in terms of everything, men, tanks, artillery, air power.

I really don't get it, I went from the basic game where I conquered the whole of the UK with about 15 paratrooper divisions, asking myself "why was that as easy as it was?" to this, where I am asking myself "what just happened???" as I receive failure/defeat messages which show I cannot even make a dent against the Soviets even if I outnumber them 2 to 1, or in some cases, 4 to 1.

Overall the mod is good, I don't want to come off as being seen to bash the mod, as that is neither my intention nor desire. But I have to ask, what is up with the combat (particularly ground combat?).

One nasty incident that comes to mind, rebels rose up in Corsica, one single unit, and it took a full month, yes a month, for 3 paratrooper divisions (2 German 1 Italian), in conjunction with 1 Italian infantry division launching an amphibious assault, along with 4 Spanish capital ships providing shore bombardment, along with 3 German tactical bombers (level 85 experience) providing interdiction, and 3 more German tactical bombers (level 85 experience) providing ground attacks, to overcome this single rebel/partisan formation.

I wasn't sure whether to laugh, cry, or scream, at this point. The notion that a band of rebels, on Corsica of all places, could stand against four divisions of Axis soldiers, fighting them off for a full month??? What is the population base on Corsica that could possibly support/sustain an uprising by a group of people sufficient in number and equipment to fend off FOUR divisions of Axis soldiers for a full month?

I just want to know if there is some possibility of victory at the end of all of this, the nice reward of success to match the fun and the struggle, for the player who endures and sees it through to the end? Is it winnable?
 
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
One example, taking place now-

Isai, under attack by 42 Soviet Divisions attacking from two different provinces (both must pass over a river). Note that it is also raining.

The Soviets have 1 armored division, 7 motorized divisions, and 35 infantry divisions. Perhaps 40% of their divisions have brigades, mostly artillery.


The defenders (me) have the following-
2 Panzer Divisions (German- 1942, with medium armor brigades)
2 Panzer-Grenadier Divisions (German-1940, with self-propelled artillery)
7 Infantry Divisions (German- 1941, 5 artillery brigades, 1 AT brigade)
1 Paratrooper Division (Italian- 1939)
1 Cavalry Division (Romanian- 1918, with artillery)
4 Infantry Divisions (Romanian- 1941, 1 AT brigade)
7 Infantry Divisions (Romanian- 1939, 3 AT brigades, 2 AC brigades)
1 Tank Division (Romanian- 1936)


The Soviets have thus far employed no airpower, but they are about to finish off the defenders and win against them. Shouldn't the forces defending the province be sufficient to adequately defend it?

To add to the defense, I decided to have the forces in a neighboring province attack across part of the river and hit 13 of the Soviet divisions (12 infantry 1 motorized cavalry) to take the wind out of their sails.

Attack effort-

8 Infantry Divisions (German- 1941, 4 artillery brigades, 1 AA brigade)
4 Cavalry Divisions (German- 1938 semi-motorized, 3 artillery brigades, 1 AA brigade)
1 Armored Division (Romanian- 1936)
4 Cavalry Divisions (Romanian- 1918)
3 Infantry Divisions (Romanian- 1939, 1 AA brigade)
4 Infantry Divisions (Romanian- 1941, 1 artillery brigade)



Thus far the attack hasn't even taken any pressure off of the forces in Isai that are under fierce Soviet attack.

I fail to understand how the Soviets can use an almost entirely infantry based force to cross a river, during the rain, and wind up ready to overrun a dozen German infantry divisions, 2 German Panzer divisions, and 2 Panzer-Grenadier divisions, but 10 German panzer divisions, along with more than 30 infantry divisions, cannot move from plain terrain to plain terrain, in fine weather, and overcome a force comprised mostly of Soviet infantry, which they happen to out-number.
 
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
Koevoet said:
One example, taking place now-
-snip-


Okay, spoke too soon, the Soviets just turned tail and bolted away, breaking off the assault... But still, it came dangerously close to succeeding, and it really cost me a lot to repulse what was basically a haphazard reckless assault by infantry against strong armored and mechanized formations.
 
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
Seems I spoke too soon in several regards. The Soviets were all bark and no bite, their assaults turned out to be blunders as they wore themselves down against my defenses, and now I am rapidly advancing against them along a wide-front. Losses are heavy, but the going is good.

:)
 
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
Okay, one more thing that bothers me. For the Soviets to go from seemingly ready to penetrate into German occupied western Poland, to on the run, what the heck happened? Is this some sort of screwy AI or were they were just undertaking offensives they were unable to handle?
 
Aug 19, 2008
279
0
I'm finally "feeling the realism" so to speak (at least as my understanding of it goes). Everything seems to be a see-saw, back and forth. In Africa, Rommel has managed been in Khartoum at least three times, and had to leave and pull back three times due to failures of Italian units covering the flanks.

In the Soviet Union, provinces frequently change hands. Baku changed hands several times (Italians lost it), before several divisions of German paratroopers were brought in. I believe they'll be able to hold it...


Anyway, combat seems roughly balanced, it's decently enjoyable. I've obliterated some Soviets corps here and there, but no massive encirclements against entire armies yet.


It's a real "keep you on your toes" feeling, although I believe victory is quite possible, but it won't be easy by any measure.
 
Last edited: