i prefer the birth name
@Lobster : i have edited the events with your idea about the relation between france and england
@Lobster : i have edited the events with your idea about the relation between france and england
De-VILLARS said:i prefer the birth name![]()
@Lobster : i have edited the events with your idea about the relation between france and england
yes but for the event we schould put different dates because if we put 2 events in the same date (1700-1705 for example) the trigger risks to don't be efficient (i don't know if it's clear)I thought I already gave the dates
i think we schould put a choice :Ok here's another event
Jean Talon
In 1665 Jean Talon (1625-1694) arrived in New France as the colony's first Intendant. Talon soon proved himself to be an a resourceful and engergetic administrator and he attempted to diversify the colony's economy by encouraging agriculture, fishing, lumbering, and industry as well as the traditional fur trade. In 1666 he conducted the first census in North America. attempted to diversify the colony's economy by encouraging agriculture, fishing, lumbering, and industry as well as the traditional fur trade in an effort to encourage self-sufficiency for the colonies rather than constantly importing good from France. In 1666 he conducted the first census in North America. While he succeeded in settling some two thousand people in the colony, many of the industries he initiated failed when he returned to France, mainly due to a lack of proper funding from France.
I'm not sure what sort of effects Talon should have, should he increase the monarch's stats? He should certainly boost infra, population and manpower and tax income. I also think their should be an option, in exchange for some money that a Naval Manufactory and a Weapon's Naval manufactory should be put in Quebec as those where his goals to 'industrialise' New France.
no because he wasn't minister or prime ministershould he increase the monarch's stats
i don't think so because he worked in new france but not in the rest of the realmHe should certainly boost infra
yes yes and yespopulation and manpower and tax income
yesalso think their should be an option, in exchange for some money that a Naval Manufactory and a Weapon's Naval manufactory should be put in Quebec as those where his goals to 'industrialise' New France.
De-VILLARS said:yes but for the event we schould put different dates because if we put 2 events in the same date (1700-1705 for example) the trigger risks to don't be efficient (i don't know if it's clear)
i think we schould put a choice :
A) employ him
b) we don't want him in new france
no because he wasn't minister or prime minister
i don't think so because he worked in new france but not in the rest of the realm
yes yes and yes![]()
yes
we can make that :
an event where we chose or not talon which trigger a second event where we can decide what he will do ( a) give him a few money; b) give him more money, c) give him the power in new france->the most expensive)
for the Radisson event with the description and the dates we can propose the events for the AGCEEP in few time![]()
Sute]{h said:Hmm... I wrote the Salam event a while back. Made it possible for them to trigger for all christian countries. I know the text mentions English institutions, but that was to keep it loyal to history. I didn't want to limit it to England because colonization is to unscripted in EU2 and it could just as easily have taken place in another christian colonial power.
it wasn't clearLobster said:But none of the events have random dates, they all have specific dates to fire on
De-VILLARS said:it wasn't clear![]()
i have edited the events (the dates) go see them and tell me if it's good
we have to add the id (event and leaders) but i don't know how to find these number![]()
they fires betwenn two dates thanks to the offset, for example :They're good but I don't see why they can't just fire on a specific date rather then having a random chance of firing between to dates.
#Radisson and des Groseilliers#FRA1
event = {
id =
random = no
country = FRA
name = "EVENTNAME"
desc = "EVENTHIST"
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1660 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 28 month = december year = 1662 }
action_a ={ #Confiscate the furs!#
name = "ACTIONNAME3318A"
command = { type = treasury value = 100 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = id } #Radisson
command = { type = sleepleader which = id } #des Groseillers
command = { type = land value = 100 }
command = { type = trigger which = ENG1 } #Radisson and des Groseilliers Offer their Services to England
}
action_b ={ #Let them keep their furs... #END
name = "ACTIONNAME3318B"
command = { type = treasury value = -100 }
}
}
De-VILLARS said:they fires betwenn two dates thanks to the offset, for example :
this event will fires between 1660 and 1662 with a test (offset) for each period of 30 days
i think we schould finish these events before build othersit will be more simple
Perhaps it should only happen to a country with a innovative slider around what UK it supposed to have at that time... Meaning it won't happen to the UK or any other christian power if they are much more innovative than they were historically. Of course an innovative country properly doesn't have the colonists in the first place.Semi-Lobster said:But it would hardly work for Catholic countries who where never into the whole witch burning thing.
what do you mean by "set date" ?Lobster said:Wouldn't it be simpler thought just have it fire at a set date though?
i agree but if we chose this system we threat too much the colonisation of the country which were colonialistPerhaps it should only happen to a country with a innovative slider around what UK it supposed to have at that time... Meaning it won't happen to the UK or any other christian power if they are much more innovative than they were historically. Of course an innovative country properly doesn't have the colonists in the first place.
In what way would we threaten colonisation by adding a trigger requirement in the Salam Witch trials? That event is mostly flavour anyways and doesn't really affect colonisation.De-VILLARS said:i agree but if we chose this system we threat too much the colonisation of the country which were colonialist
this system isn't present for the actual explorer (like verrazzano for france) so i think we schouldn't chose this way of simulation![]()
i don't know the event on the salem witch trial so i can't speak about itIn what way would we threaten colonisation by adding a trigger requirement in the Salam Witch trials? That event is mostly flavour anyways and doesn't really affect colonisation.
yes, no, yes, yesprestige bonus, new COT or royal dockyard, population +1000, +tax
yesand + 1 fortress
De-VILLARS said:i don't know the event on the salem witch trial so i can't speak about it
i think that it's not the policy of the HC to put trigger for each event because it's very complicated and, moreover, IA sometimes doesn't chose the good choice so if we add trigger at this we are not sure that the event can take place
@lobster :
i have changed the id because they were wrong![]()
yes, no, yes, yes
yes
i think we schould make an only event because it's not at the centre of france history (i prefer 2 or 3 events but we must limit ourselves)
i propose this :
1) -300 gold, +3 in fortress, +2 tax, +2000 population
2) +150 gold, +2 colonists
go look you PM![]()
i hava no time to analyse, it will be for the weekendI was unsure if you could add multiple level of fortresses at once but having one or two events is good. I think it should be two events, one to build and one when it is finished since it took so long to build and drained so much money.
De-VILLARS said:i hava no time to analyse, it will be for the weekend![]()
You can. All you need to do is change the number to something other than 1 or -1Semi-Lobster said:I was unsure if you could add multiple level of fortresses at once but having one or two events is good. I think it should be two events, one to build and one when it is finished since it took so long to build and drained so much money.