What use are collaboration governments over integrated puppets? I've read the wiki and the only difference I can see is that a collaboration government won't try to increase autonomy .. any thoughts on when it should be used..
Collaboration governments
- Thread starter markslawson
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Collaboration governments give 75% of their civilian factories to their overlords, while integrated puppets only give 25%. (both types are otherwise the same and give 75% of their military factories)
You don't need to garrison your collaboration governments, you don't need to build up compliance, and you can use their manpower in colonial templates.
Anywhere an integrated puppet would be nice, a collaboration government is slightly better. The tradeoff between having high-compliance territory vs having a collaboration government really depends. If they grant a lot of resources, (say, British Malaya) I prefer them to be annexed. If they grant a lot of manpower but don't have so many resources, (say, China) I prefer a collaboration government. Anything else is hard to say.
It's all up to you!
You don't need to garrison your collaboration governments, you don't need to build up compliance, and you can use their manpower in colonial templates.
Anywhere an integrated puppet would be nice, a collaboration government is slightly better. The tradeoff between having high-compliance territory vs having a collaboration government really depends. If they grant a lot of resources, (say, British Malaya) I prefer them to be annexed. If they grant a lot of manpower but don't have so many resources, (say, China) I prefer a collaboration government. Anything else is hard to say.
It's all up to you!
- 1
Okay, just to take the discussion one step further if you annex for the resources without running the collaborations government mission first, then I take it you need to run the supervision level up past military governor?? Low compliance doesn't mean much in the way of resources..
I'm talking more from the perspective of "I have this territory with enough compliance to make it a collaboration government... do I want to?"
You'll definitely need to get compliance up if you've annexed a country without running collaboration missions.
If you managed to get a peace conference and annex a territory, it's almost always better to use the options which grant the greatest compliance gain. Resistance doesn't really matter while it's below 50%, and on local police or lower you should have a good 50% compliance within a year of annexation, which in most cases is going to get you the most.
- 2
How can (if they can) The Raj implement collaboration governments in Mandalay, Burma, and Pakistan?
Compliance government are worse, than if you have 80% compliance. Yout get more resources and factories with you controlling the land. So just have it and only use it in China with not that great economy but good manpower, as infinte manpower pool. Or India.
Compliance government ruins your borders... You are Poland, you wanna release germany as a compliance puppet, but they take königsberg even though königsberg is your core...
I always run the Collaboration government in High Manpower places and places with great resources. France, Russian, China, Raj, Dutch East Indies and USA are all prime locations for a collaboration governemnt spy agency thing. I dont make the collab government as a puppet, but I take their land since you geta ton of their manpower and resources. I hate taking colonial manpower. Just feels... off.
But if you have 100 collab yout get all resources anyways and more factories. So it is better to just have it all. For Garissions just puppet something in Africa or so ^^