Are you holding the whole Duchy of Galloway, and are you holding the King of Venice title? I have no control over de jure drift mind you so whatever the problem is has nothing to do with CK2+.
CK2Plus - Balance improvements, more kingdoms and empires, more ambitions and plots
- Thread starter Wizzington
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
- Status
Are you holding the whole Duchy of Galloway, and are you holding the King of Venice title? I have no control over de jure drift mind you so whatever the problem is has nothing to do with CK2+.
Greetings Wiz and you all,
Wiz, I noticed that when I'm a vassal of some AI liege, and my liege asks me to pay liege taxes(which I see from the incomes-expenses balance in the demesne overview) they aren't influenced by my reputation of my liege, while others vassals like me who dislike my liege (reputation of him lower than 0) pay a lesser degree of the taxes required by the law.
This seems unfair to me: It should be considered that my opinion of my liege is negative, and a certain amount of the taxes I owe him should be detracted.
Anyway thank you because your MOD is just perfect, and it makes the game far better than the core one.
You are awesome! Compliments
This seems to be a hardcoded issue and nothing I can do anything about.
Neither of these things seem to be problems to me unless they happen a lot and I haven't seen either in any recent games.
On 2), the player isn't asked in the initial attempt to rally support, because there are some timing issues. I've been trying to find a solution for it.
Yeah if you started a game pre 1.28.4 there was a big issue with possessed events turning non-possessed people heretics.
One of the goals was actually less (but more severe) civil wars to make it harder to expand, since previously you could just gobble up the AI whenever it was a in a civil war. It's possible civil wars need a boost to succeed more often, I'll look into it.
This is not actually done at the moment, I wanted to see if my alternative mechanic for independence will do the trick. Only titular titles (except for special titles like the Papacy) are destroyed as a result of a revolt.
They have holy orders and some special CB mechanics. That's pretty much it.
I read your AAR and had a good laugh the other day. I'd suggest trying a Count under a Duke (or in a non-created Duchy) next time, de jure claims can be lethal.
Also, fixed for next version.
This is until I can sort out 'Prince of Imperial Rebels' because I kept getting complaints about it.
I think you should keep in mind that just because certain things happened every single game in 1.27 does not mean does things should always happen in 1.28. The new civil war system is still in its infancy and I am testing and tweaking it as we speak.
Total troops are nerfed, but on the other hand they previously did not coordinate their armies and would get easily crushed by their liege's doomstack, so its a tradeoff. It's worth noting that rebels will have 100 opinion of the rebel leader, so they will raise as much as crown authority allows.
I'm going to run some handsoff games and see whether civil wars are really failing as much as you guys seem to think they are, or whether we're dealing with observer bias - in my own games I have not noticed any pattern of constant failures.
This isn't really something I consider desirable - civil wars should not be won simply because AI is bad at prioritizing. It's stupid and unrealistic.
I think some of you guys may be a little too used to the constant civil wars and realm collapses in 1.27. That is not how history played out, and it made the game rather easy since you could just conquer your neighbours during their once-a-decade civil wars. The new civil wars are meant to be dangerous to the player while simultaneously being something that the AI can handle with how it currently controls its armies. If civil war success rate is too low, I'll just up AI willingness to join them.
I ran a 100-year handsoff with an immortal Duke of Iceland tracking civil war statistics through variables. Here are the results:
The main problem seems to be that civil wars in large realms have a hard time taking off. Once they actually start, the success rate is close to 50% without player intervention which I consider ideal. I will add some modifiers to make rebels more likely to support a civil war against a powerful liege - this should also help break up megablobs.
The main problem seems to be that civil wars in large realms have a hard time taking off. Once they actually start, the success rate is close to 50% without player intervention which I consider ideal. I will add some modifiers to make rebels more likely to support a civil war against a powerful liege - this should also help break up megablobs.
I saw this happen too, but I've also seen him hold onto the Kingdom. I don't think its a bad thing as long as it doesn't happen all the time.
- Status