By the way, CK2+ is NOT compatable with the new patch. The new patch, at minimum, adds some new entries to defines.lua and without those entries the game will crash.
CK2Plus - Balance improvements, more kingdoms and empires, more ambitions and plots
- Thread starter Wizzington
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
Yeah I thought it a bit weird. I can't seem to hire new religious advisers and all republican families stay at 0 respect...
I APPROVE.
I also bet you are responsible for 50% of the fixes in 1.091 patch
I wouldn't say 50%, but I put in my fair share of them (even fixed Autocephaly as I promised).
So I forgot to turn off auto-update with steam and it probably updated (I'm not at home right now, but steam is on), problem is I haven't patched CKII+ since 1.33.1, out of fear of losing my save. After updating to 1.091 and getting the new CKII+ patch to play it, will I be screwed?
This is how it should be. Few days ago I was reading about some feudal generals from XI century Byzanitne Empire. One of them, Gregory Pakourianos "died in 1086 fighting the Pechenegs at the battle of Beliatoba, charging so vigorously he crashed into a tree."
(of course as long as we trust in wiki sources) from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Pakourianos
This is how it should be. Few days ago I was reading about some feudal generals from XI century Byzanitne Empire. One of them, Gregory Pakourianos "died in 1086 fighting the Pechenegs at the battle of Beliatoba, charging so vigorously he crashed into a tree."
(of course as long as we trust in wiki sources) from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_Pakourianos
And I get that, but look at all the rulers that fought in wars but lived to ripe old ages? Most of them took commanding roles not charging in the first waves... Plus nobility usually had better armor and equipment and they had the scary doctors... Combat should be dangerous but it seems more dangerous now than it should be, and more dangerous in weird circumstances like when I greatly outnumber the other army. If I have 1.5x+ more troops than them (counting modifiers) than I would think the leaders should be more safe... Plus it rarely seems like the other leaders I battle with run into the same problems. It is pretty rare that I kill another lord in battle. Heck my martial is 50 something now and has been fighting every battle for me since he was 20 and doesn't have a scratch on em (funnily enough he has 40 martial skill too, something about Jesus talking to him? I laughed when I saw that).
I'd love to have some sort of selector for commanding a battle. Basically the leader could sit back and watch (thus staying completely safe unless they lose), taking a slight morale hit, fight but do so cautiously (more dangerous but give morale bonus) and lastly ride in with the first wave (dangerous but gives bigger bonuses).
Great news! Can't wait!
Still, let me ask. Is it due to 1.091 inconsistencies that under agnatic gavelkind, in my game, the only son of King of Poland is not due to inherit (the son is in a foreign court, might matter). This sort of bugs me as I installed this king through a successful rebellion, and I don't want the imprisoned former one to come back to the throne (and that's what the screen shows).
While on inheritances is it WAD that all the baronies are cognatic-agnatic seniority? What's the rationale? Is there any chance a baron will intend to change the low (there's prestige requirement so this might be tough on them).
I play with no dlcs aand yet thanx to your mod the game feels so much richer.
I found this pretty annoying as I would often take prestigous dynasties and install them in baronies, if the dynasty had any holding outside my kingdom it was more or less inevitable before the barony passed outside the kingdom and got confiscated as a result (since baronies now get confiscated if they pass outside the realm), wasting all my efforts.
I gotta say steam is kind of getting on my nerves with updating despite me having the auto-update supposedly set to off. http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u1/wolfhoundj88/steamannoying_zpsec4f1211.png
So can anyone confirm it is safe to play with the latest official update, or is it best to wait for the compatibility patch that Wiz has planned for this evening?
So can anyone confirm it is safe to play with the latest official update, or is it best to wait for the compatibility patch that Wiz has planned for this evening?
I am waiting... same thing happend to me. Auto Updates turned off, but it downloaded it anyways. I really hate Steam.
I think u should arm yourself with trait: patient again. As Novacat already said that new patch changes defines.lua in some way so I think that CK2+ + patch 1.091 wont cooperate in 100 %.
Compatch will have to be tomorrow, I ended up having friends over and having a few too many glasses of wine. Probably shouldn't try to integrate the patch presently.
Compatch will have to be tomorrow, I ended up having friends over and having a few too many glasses of wine. Probably shouldn't try to integrate the patch presently.
That's probably wise, thanks for giving us an update.
Compatch will have to be tomorrow, I ended up having friends over and having a few too many glasses of wine. Probably shouldn't try to integrate the patch presently.
Have a good evening!
- Status