Do you have a source for if/when this should happen?
Probably in 1066, shortly befor the reign of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lhachen_Utpala, the first Raja with a Sanskrit name.-
CK2 Dev Diary #69: Another Journey to Tibet
- Thread starter rageair
- Start date
-
Crusader Kings III Available Now!
The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
This thread is more than 5 months old.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though.
Probably in 1066, shortly befor the reign of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lhachen_Utpala, the first Raja with a Sanskrit name.-
.png){kind=avatar}
Not really. China would be at least an order of magnitude more provinces than what I suspect we're getting.
Since we got Meneth on the project, we have had as a goal to not let patches slow the game down.
Do you have a source for if/when this should happen?
When you write fastest yet, do you mean faster than before you added India? Otherwise it's just less slow.
China would be this and hundreds of provinces ADDITIONALLY to this...
Not Han: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Xia
What's the difference between "faster" and "less slow"?
And what is this strange dictionary where "yet" is synonym with "since we added India"? Don't you remember how slow CK2 was compared to what it is currently?
As of Reaper's Due, the game is faster than it was in any patch before India was added; 100 years in RIP go by faster than 100 years in any pre-India patch.
As of MnM, it's even faster, though not by quite as drastic amount.
In JD, it is slightly faster than that again. It'll be the fastest it has ever been.
.png){kind=avatar}
Tibet officially has more care put into it than the actual nonsensical and buggy "random-winner-takes-all" Crusade system. In Crusader Kings II. Eastern Christianity is also still very barren.
I haven't played CK2 for a while, mostly due to the fact that it has been soooo slow since they added India.
I am glad to hear that speed has been improved.
"We have improved the game, so it's much faster now" could still mean that it is slower than before RoI.
That's the difference between faster and less slow.
You are wrong. Dude, the "winner takes all" is an excellent representation. When the Kingdom of Jerusalem was established, how many ways was it divided? ONE, and with ONE ruler. It's the most accurate representation that they can get.
I agree, however, with Eastern Christianity needing more content.
While you are in the progress of changing you the map could please add more wasteland to Europe in order encourage more historical path of expansion? I would like to see the following wastelands added:
- Cantabrian Mountains, to protect Asturias from the Muslims.
- Taurus Mountains, to protect the Romans from the Muslims and encourage break-away states.
- Kola and Finnish Lappland, that were so desolated prior to their colonization in the 16th century that army's movement through them had been a death march.
Last edited:
That looks so much better than what we first saw.
The Magyar in 867 and 769 could do with some balancing too.
Well aside from the last thing I agree. As for the last, tribals in general should be less interesting as targets for conquest. Tribals should pay next to no taxes or suply next to no manpower to non tribals and de tribalizing tribes should be a lot of work.
Small quibble, but the Persian count in 769 India meant to represent the remnants of the White Huns should probably be switched to the new Saka culture.
STOP! COOKIE TIME