My Hindu monarch has the Brahmacharya -100% chance for a new heir modifier, but he still got a 0 age heir. Did the Maharajah forget his vow to Vishnu, or is it a bug?
Celibate Hindu ruler gets heir, bug or what?
- Thread starter thecryptile
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Some events can give heirs. I'm pretty sure I've actually seen them fire while Hindu during an improvement period.
Boring explanation: your sibling or uncle had a child.
You're free to envision something more supernatural though, some historical Indian royal houses claimed to descend from a human and a more divine ancestor (a human mother in the case I'm thinking of though and more in the ck2 era).
Edit: didn't read that properly, it may indeed be a bug given the modifier. I'd still consider the above in your case as the damage is already done
You're free to envision something more supernatural though, some historical Indian royal houses claimed to descend from a human and a more divine ancestor (a human mother in the case I'm thinking of though and more in the ck2 era).
Edit: didn't read that properly, it may indeed be a bug given the modifier. I'd still consider the above in your case as the damage is already done
- 1
Is Heir chance additive? You may have had a +heir chance modifier from something else that meant you still had a small chance of an heir. Did you have any royal marriages?
- 2
4 royal marriages, that's what did it alright..
with the marriages, it's only a -75 chance to get a new heir.
Though for role playing purposes, I'm sticking with divine intervention.
- 4