IMO war score is unbalanced at the moment. It cranks up too high compared to the cost of taking territories.
Capitulation confusion
- Thread starter drake546
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I feel the math is balanced alright. There have only been a couple times where I had left over points (as far as I could tell anyway.)
Imo we should have the possibility of creating reichkomissariat style puppets there, with lower cost than annexing.
I am not sure that the problem is the total amount of war score accumulated, and the problem is definitely not manifest when there is only one primary winner who then logically takes it all.
The problem is that when there are two or more winners who have significant amounts of contribution the rotation allows for too large of pieces to be taken all at once. This leads to some great inequities. The actual objectives chosen by any side seem to make no real difference in the outcome. Add the problems caused by the AI feeling no hesitation whatsoever to avoid border gore in its choices and the peace conferences become a source of player dissatisfaction.
That's more to the point. Germany can annex half the USSR before I get a chance to grab one western province (where the value is.) Or in my commie America game where the Soviets puppeteer literally the whole world before I got to pick from the slim leftovers.
I think more rounds and "objective" based claims make sense.
I think more rounds and "objective" based claims make sense.