TheOx you're correct they were never landed and always people of famous repute not noblemen though by the player's choice you could give them titles and positions on your council.
Cannibalizing TPATT
- Thread starter mgr251
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Oh i see. Well as you point out yourself there is quite a degree of historical determinism in such events too.
Curious, what are the chances of getting a courtier with high stats? I'll only ever seen mediocre people show up, nothing like seeing Seljuk or Timur showing up.
I would actually be quite partial to having the Ottomans appear in game like Seljuq - this would of course be dependent upon the Rum event in PB having occurred. The numbers of the invasion should be so that the Byzzies or Rum at their full strength could beat him off, but a weakened Rum or Byzantine Empire could not fend him off.
+1 to that.
Adding the french peerage system would also be great :12 peers:
6 were ecclesiastical: 1 Archbishop-Duke (Reims), 2 Bishops-Dukes (Laon and Langres) and three Bishops-Counts (Beauvais, Châlons, Noyon)
6 were temporal: 3 Dukes (Burgundy, Normandy, Aquitaine (the king of England)) and three counts (Flanders, Champagne, Toulouse).
Adding the french peerage system would also be great :12 peers:
6 were ecclesiastical: 1 Archbishop-Duke (Reims), 2 Bishops-Dukes (Laon and Langres) and three Bishops-Counts (Beauvais, Châlons, Noyon)
6 were temporal: 3 Dukes (Burgundy, Normandy, Aquitaine (the king of England)) and three counts (Flanders, Champagne, Toulouse).
Like i said earlier the teams for the various modules already has a lot of plans and a lot of things on their to-do list. So you shouldn't get your hopes up for any TPATT-like additions in the immediate future. It'll take some time if it even happens.
It'd be interesting to have a somewhat genericized great person feature, with famous historical figures as models, and a specific set of circumstances required to spawn them.
But you have to concede that Solo's way in Patrum Scuta was the best one to make what no one has done before: historical dynasties would appear organically with their own real coats of arms. It was one of the things that hurt the most from TPatT's demise. He made a CoA matrix with most possible factors and then he made the combinations in the dynasty files with the custom CoA codes. Extremely time consuming, but also the best way to go.
So basically, people are going to take parts out of TPATT and add it to another mod?
It sounds like some people would like the different module runners to do so. But nothing is planned yet.
TPATT was the best mod I ever played for CK2. Unless they take the features of TPATT and implement them elsewhere, the VIET or SWMH mods will not live up to TPATT.
What do you want me to say to a reply like yours? I get that you really liked TPATT, but TPATT and the HIP modules have/had different ideas about how to best give players a great mod experience.
And that's totally okay, because we can't please everyone and we're not going to try and please everyone either.
I made a statement, I wasn't replying to anyone. I never asked for you to say anything either, so what do you mean what do I want you to say?
That doesn't make my reply anymore odd. My reply is just a statement too. You said that unless TPATT gets integrated in VIET or SWMH they would never be as good as TPATT. I don't agree with that, so my comment was just a reflection of that opinion in a diplomatic fashion.
I'm allowed to show my opinion too.
.png){kind=avatar}
again none of the HIP project member has plan to integrate -or that odd word "cannibalize"- any part of TPATT, whichever good were some parts of it.