- Jul 7, 2019
Sure. Suggesting and having good debates about it is perfectly okay and wanted. I have no issue discussing these things.I mean that content designed by PDX developers is as bad (or worse) as the content designed by freelancers.
We asked to do more history, because we feel it's been neglected for alt-history. If PDX needs to do less alt-history for that, I'll take it. But that's not "I want less alt-history". We want at least to have the same priority for history and for alt-history. It's what I said before, how can I possibly want less alt-history if I only play alt-history?
The other complaint is that we want good content, both in history and in alt-history, which we aren't getting.
"Good is subjective". No. Good is partly objective and partly subjective. Everyone that plays TNO praises it for its good content and alt-history. Does that mean that we are all wrong because good is subjective and TNO may be actually bad? No, if so many people agree, it's because it's good. Personal likings affect how much we like content, not if content is good. Content is good or bad by itself. I can dislike something but recognize it's good; or I can like something I know it's bad.
PDX decides, but we can suggest things and debate about their decisions, can't we?
Good isn't totally subjective, read above.