Keep in mind that the WE% for democratic countries is there for a reason. I would love more events, but events that put the Axis and Allies immediately at war should be extremely rare.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Keep in mind that the WE% for democratic countries is there for a reason. I would love more events, but events that put the Axis and Allies immediately at war should be extremely rare.
Originally posted by Steel
Doesn't workSlept leaders don't come back.
Yes, I've noticed that too... Great, in revisited purges I unintentionally killed Rokossovski, Gorbatov...
Someone posted this on the bug forum?
It's mentioned in Polish Army in the Middle East and People Army of Poland event series. Katyn affected USSR-Polish relations mostly, Allies were not much concerned, as long as the war was on. Bitter but true.
Originally posted by Copper Nicus
Yes, I've noticed that too... Great, in revisited purges I unintentionally killed Rokossovski, Gorbatov...
Someone posted this on the bug forum?
Yeah, Nachinus reported it here and I've just bumped it to get a response if it's WAD or not. At least until 1.05 we should probably disable the sleepleader events in core_Germany, core_UK and core_USSR. The sleepleader in natchi.txt is ok to keep, once the German mission is withdrawn it stays withdrawn.
Ok, I agree... It will be a bit stupid for UK and USSR to have polish commanders from the start, but what can we do...
I just suggest cuting leaders that was intended to awake in Purges, not dumping whole event (see below)...
#########################################################################
# The Great Officer Purge Begins (modded by Copper Nicus)
#########################################################################
event = {
id = 2609
random = no
country = SOV
name = "EVT_2609_NAME"
desc = "EVT_2609_DESC"
style = 0
date = { day = 1 month = march year = 1937 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME2609A" # Purge the traitors!
command = { type = sleepleader which = 11504 } # Tuchaczevsky
command = { type = sleepminister which = 4007 } # Tuchaczevsky minister
command = { type = sleepleader which = 10134 } # Yegorov
command = { type = sleepleader which = -2 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = -2 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = -2 }
command = { type = sleepleader which = -2 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME2609B" # No need for brutality
command = { type = dissent value = 10 }
}
}
About the Rhineland crisis events
IMHO, in the second GER event, (the one that fires if France has an energical response and threatens with war), the two options should be inverted: a) ('historical')option should be withdraw the troops and no provoke France b)we will stay- may trigger WAR
Historically, the orders issued to the commanders of the units that moved into Rhineland were to withdraw immediatly if there were any sign of a French military reaction, but as french didn´t made a single move, they stood in Rhineland . This is documented, and changing the options this way would decrease the possibilities of a seriously unhistorical outcome: WAR.
What do you think?
Oh!, another thing, the event triggers a few days after the game starts. I don´t know why... maybe the ai moves units to those provs immediatly, or they were there in the beggining?
IMHO, in the second GER event, (the one that fires if France has an energical response and threatens with war), the two options should be inverted: a) ('historical')option should be withdraw the troops and no provoke France b)we will stay- may trigger WAR
Historically, the orders issued to the commanders of the units that moved into Rhineland were to withdraw immediatly if there were any sign of a French military reaction, but as french didn´t made a single move, they stood in Rhineland
. This is documented, and changing the options this way would decrease the possibilities of a seriously unhistorical outcome: WAR. What do you think?
Oh!, another thing, the event triggers a few days after the game starts. I don´t know why... maybe the ai moves units to those provs immediatly, or they were there in the beggining?
Re: About the Rhineland crisis events
Yes, AI got border priorities, so it fires too early - it's pretty easy to correct, event should start counting not january the 1st, but later, probably historical date would be good.
Yes, AI got border priorities, so it fires too early - it's pretty easy to correct, event should start counting not january the 1st, but later, probably historical date would be good.
Wilhelm Gustloff & Steuben
FYI I've gone ahead and coded the sinking of Wilhelm Gustloff & General von Steuben. Slow day at work
FYI I've gone ahead and coded the sinking of Wilhelm Gustloff & General von Steuben. Slow day at work
Re: Re: About the Rhineland crisis events
no the event is not working right, play with Germany, don't move your troops and the event will trigger anyway, i am checking the conditions right now...
Originally posted by Generalisimo
can you delete the "forbidden" posts? so anyone that comes here doesn't answer to them... just an idea...
No, they will be much more usefull staying, as they will be a good example to set the actual limits more clearly.
sorry, i completely forgot to answer this...
um, no I dont exactly want to code atm...
Originally posted by SykoNurse
sorry, i completely forgot to answer this...
um, no I dont exactly want to code atm...
It's done already
as I had a slow day at work last week. I'd prefer to focus on Far East and Scandinavian events as far as possible but I don't mind occassionally dropping in to the other regions. Anyway:172082 - The sinking of Wilhelm Gustloff (by Steel)
172083 - The sinking of General von Steuben (by Steel)
They'll be in C.O.R.E. 0.3.
As I mentioned in the USSR thread, I've written and tested the Commercial Agreement between USSR and Germany. Basically the way it works is that Germany will get some resources and USSR will get some IC and supplies. This repeats every couple of month as long as Germany and USSR don't go to war with each other.
This of course has an undesired effect of giving Germany even more resources in the 1939-1941 period. To balance this I've written some events that represent a British/French naval blockade of Germany to stop imports of foodstuff, rubber and other critical material. Essentially I'm treating the resources stockpile as if it was a mix of warehoused material and futures (stuff not yet delivered), the latter of which would be susceptible to intercept. If anybody violently disagrees with this then let me know, but it was the best idea I could come up with for putting some pressure on German resource economy.
This of course has an undesired effect of giving Germany even more resources in the 1939-1941 period. To balance this I've written some events that represent a British/French naval blockade of Germany to stop imports of foodstuff, rubber and other critical material. Essentially I'm treating the resources stockpile as if it was a mix of warehoused material and futures (stuff not yet delivered), the latter of which would be susceptible to intercept. If anybody violently disagrees with this then let me know, but it was the best idea I could come up with for putting some pressure on German resource economy.
I don't know exactly how many IC's you give USSR, but I would be careful with IC's. Every IC gain to a province represents 1800 IC's (360 * 5). So I wouldn't give too many IC's.
Another option is to give steel to USSR. IRL the SU had a steel shortage during the 30's which lend-lease solved (US sent vast amounts of railroad track and rolling stock which saved SU steel for other purposes). Don't know if its so in HOI though.
Another option is to give steel to USSR. IRL the SU had a steel shortage during the 30's which lend-lease solved (US sent vast amounts of railroad track and rolling stock which saved SU steel for other purposes). Don't know if its so in HOI though.
Why 360x5? I understand the 360 part (days per year), but why 5 years? This is in effect from 1939 onwards so potentially the gain is higher, but there's a good chance some of it is lost to Germany when they invade. Essentially the USSR benefit should be 0-18 months assuming that the Commercial Agreement kicks in about a year and a half before Germany invades USSR. Benefit would then be (on average) 270xIC given for USSR.
About the steel, I know that at least part of the German exports was steel pipes and such but in game Germany is already short on steel... I think supplies will have to represent this.
About the steel, I know that at least part of the German exports was steel pipes and such but in game Germany is already short on steel... I think supplies will have to represent this.