Possible or not?
Tried it with 12 province emperor Brandenburg, me (main offender in war) and France went for burgundy (BS war for unlawful territory, the one after first reform). The aim was to force inheritance. No luck. No heir, ruler general, 100% occupation, no diplo points from CFP etc. 20 years.
I'm asking this , cause the wiki + the files say 'not at war with emperor or no provinces of emperor occupied by burgundy'...
I don't get it. The latter should be logically enough: if burgundy isn't at war with emperor it automatically does not occupy emperor's land... so why distinction? It would be enough to write "no emperor province occupied by burgundy"...
Is it that I can't be main belligirent/offender or what?
Two different games for me this happened and no inheritance.
Yeah ... thats that.
oh, btw is French emperor still able to inherit all of Burgundy?
Tried it with 12 province emperor Brandenburg, me (main offender in war) and France went for burgundy (BS war for unlawful territory, the one after first reform). The aim was to force inheritance. No luck. No heir, ruler general, 100% occupation, no diplo points from CFP etc. 20 years.
I'm asking this , cause the wiki + the files say 'not at war with emperor or no provinces of emperor occupied by burgundy'...
I don't get it. The latter should be logically enough: if burgundy isn't at war with emperor it automatically does not occupy emperor's land... so why distinction? It would be enough to write "no emperor province occupied by burgundy"...
Is it that I can't be main belligirent/offender or what?
Two different games for me this happened and no inheritance.
Yeah ... thats that.
oh, btw is French emperor still able to inherit all of Burgundy?