also lets not forget Wilhelm II often manipulated by his generals and ministers then got backstabbed by them
also lets not forget Wilhelm II often manipulated by his generals and ministers then got backstabbed by them
snips
From wikipedia:
"On 2 December 1919, Wilhelm wrote to Field Marshal August von Mackensen, denouncing his own abdication as the "deepest, most disgusting shame ever perpetrated by a person in history, the Germans have done to themselves... egged on and misled by the tribe of Judah ... Let no German ever forget this, nor rest until these parasites have been destroyed and exterminated from German soil!"[29] Wilhelm advocated a "regular international all-worlds pogrom à la Russe" as "the best cure" and further believed that Jews were a "nuisance that humanity must get rid of some way or other. I believe the best thing would be gas!"[30]"
Kaiser willhelm can't pull the "but I got Jewish friends!" on this one. Unless this is the formal antisemitism you refer to (lol) but you can apologize for him all you want though. I was somewhat exaggerating about german master race but yeah.
And he wasn't completely powerless, either.
Thank you. Agreed, of course. CONCERT OF EUROPE!!!! BALANCE OF POWER!!! MONARCHY!!!Oh...hehe...monarchists
If there was one good thing about the "evil" time in Germany - than that the importance of aristocracy were reduced, to the, possible minimum back than.
In game terms:
Its really possible that Wehrmacht revolt, as it was nearly happend in 1938 in "amunition crisis". But I doubt honestly, that they would send some invitation letter to Doorn.
More Goerdeler, Beck and Fritsch than Wilhelm II.
Off course, I support everything, what brings more possibilities to the game. So Paradox, make it for the monarchists
(Largely) non-violent Antisemitism was a common european phenomen during the time. Jews were easy to blame (almost no non-jewish relatives) - and people blamed them for whatever bad stuff happened (unless a culprit was already clearly defined). People were killed - Jews (until police managed to round up a murderer). Wars lost - Jews. Bad harvest - Jews.Unless this is the formal antisemitism you refer to (lol) but you can apologize for him all you want though.
Nope. Wilhelm not wielding power doesn't imply he couldn't.And he was completely powerless...
(Largely) non-violent Antisemitism was a common european phenomen during the time. Jews were easy to blame (almost no non-jewish relatives) - and people blamed them for whatever bad stuff happened (unless a culprit was already clearly defined). People were killed - Jews (until police managed to round up a murderer). Wars lost - Jews. Bad harvest - Jews.
Issuing 'I'm going to kill you' statements is a common part of the time's antisemitism - actually killing Jews isn't. It's entirely possible that this is just a expression of usual bragging, as well as real extreme antisemitism. We'll never know (unless someone invents a time travel machine, allowing us to test it).
Nope. Wilhelm not wielding power doesn't imply he couldn't.
(classic european) Antisemitism has its roots deep in medivial times. All three monotheistic religions forbade money lending (at least, if you're going to make profit), muslims were insignificant in christian europe, leaving Jews to act as the continents bankers for almost a millenium. People hated the banker part - not the jewish part. However, over generations people forgot why their ancestors hated so much people with Jewish religion as a common denominator, and started to hate Jews for being somehow evil. All non-American societies have population groups hated for being somehow evil. Americans don't, mostly because their societies are just 300-400 years old. The fact, that Jews aren't technically allowed to marry non-Jews, just increased this. They made themselves vulnerable by being genetically seperate from the remaining population - and reinforced public opinion of them being some sort of secret conspiracy ((not saying that Jews are guilty of being murdered (or hated). They are NOT - there is nothing like being guilty for being a victim.)).I don't know it was in other countries...
I think he meant that more in light of and atheist doesn't have a set of ethics given to him by his religion and thus creates his own ethics or follows social norms and values has no obligation to follow them after all if you don't believe that there is punishment after you die,why not do bad things.So although I don't think all atheist are bad and immoral I do think that atheist are not necessary as obliged to be good as religious persons and could bring themselves to such things more easily seeing as there are no consequences.So... atheists aren't afraid of commiting genocide? Right. I think I'm going to commit a genocide now, as for being atheist and so, and I'm going to start with really ill-informed god-fearing people who think only religious ones have ethics. Just being sarcastic, mind you, but that commentary hurt.
I think he meant that more in light of and atheist doesn't have a set of ethics given to him by his religion and thus creates his own ethics or follows social norms and values has no obligation to follow them after all if you don't believe that there is punishment after you die,why not do bad things.So although I don't think all atheist are bad and immoral I do think that atheist are not necessary as obliged to be good as religious persons and could bring themselves to such things more easily seeing as there are no consequences.