• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

t6.28

Major
34 Badges
Jun 16, 2015
674
831
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Magicka
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Prison Architect
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Darkest Hour
Today a war of giant scale broke out. Starting with a minor trade conflict between Ulm and Ravensburg a massive battle Great Britain, Poland-Lithuania, France and Castille started.

Does that sound like a likely scenario to you?

To avoid such giant fights caused by minor wars I would propose the following system:
Every war in the game should be assigned an importance value, which is influenced by the CB (diplomatic insult and trade conflict could have a low, conquer province a medium and coalition war, personal union war a high importance factor). The size of the two sides (counting only those countries that have to join, but not normal allies) should also be added as well as maybe some other factors (e.g. number of claims/cores on enemy).
Depending on the resulting importance values, allies should be more or less likely to join this war. If a war has a very low importance, no (or only small) allies should join on either side, if it has a very high importance almost all allies should join on both sides.
That would also make diplomacy more interesting, since you can't just rely on one big ally to protect you in all battles, but also now need some smaller allies to help you in the unimportant wars.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Upvote 0

grommile

Field Marshal
66 Badges
Jun 4, 2011
22.458
38.916
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Stellaris
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • March of the Eagles
  • Knights of Pen and Paper 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Prison Architect
Do you mean "your allies will refuse to defend you in a trade war" or "the game won't send out defensive CtAs for a trade war"?

And remember: with EU4's mechanics, there's no such thing as an unimportant war.
 

t6.28

Major
34 Badges
Jun 16, 2015
674
831
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Semper Fi
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Magicka
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Prison Architect
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Darkest Hour
Do you mean "your allies will refuse to defend you in a trade war" or "the game won't send out defensive CtAs for a trade war"?

It would probably be better if the game just wouldn't send out the defensive calls if they are not going to join.

And remember: with EU4's mechanics, there's no such thing as an unimportant war.

Yes, that would also have to be changed. Maybe further increased warscore costs for provinces in trade/insult wars to allow for more unimportant wars.
 

grommile

Field Marshal
66 Badges
Jun 4, 2011
22.458
38.916
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Stellaris
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • March of the Eagles
  • Knights of Pen and Paper 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Prison Architect
Yes, that would also have to be changed. Maybe further increased warscore costs for provinces in trade/insult wars to allow for more unimportant wars.
Declare war with low-significance CB. Occupy victim with relative impunity. Wait for CfP. White peace.

I hope they didn't need their Diplo points.