Last post about this here, but:
I'm sure I've talked about Japan in the past. And no, I don't think Johan saying saying it's working as designed could be counted as trolling, nor do I think he's required to answer further questions from you unless he feels like it. I can't speak for him, but I supect he saw people saying "X is happening" and since X is WAD, he made a quick "That's WAD" post. It was a quick, off the cuff remark from his home account, and he's off this week. There's no sinister background to it.
As for Japan. The whole "Japan is internally divided, but externally still viewed as one country" system meant we had to make the emperor's nation un-annexable, as it's loss would break the daimyo system. The downside of this is of course that you cannot conquer Japan before it has been united. "WAD" doesn't mean "Perfect" or "Will never change", but it is working in the way it was designed to do.
However, if you want to talk about the design of Japan further, please make a new thread.
Well you could talk about almost anything here by that logic. Try to keep the patch threads to stuff that has changed in the patch, as getting feedback about that is the prime purpose of these threads.
Why is Japan working as designed in it's current state?
Couldn't it be considered trolling for someone to post something inflationary like Japan is working as designed, without a follow up? That was the very beginning of how this thread got off topic in the first place. Many of these ideas and complaints have been said before without any response or resolution, and when Balor said what he did it seems as though that is the closest this forum has ever come to hearing a reason why the Japan problem has never been rectified. So, 15 pages in, we are still asking the same question. What you call trolling would be eased significantly if we could only have an answer to this simple question.
I'm sure I've talked about Japan in the past. And no, I don't think Johan saying saying it's working as designed could be counted as trolling, nor do I think he's required to answer further questions from you unless he feels like it. I can't speak for him, but I supect he saw people saying "X is happening" and since X is WAD, he made a quick "That's WAD" post. It was a quick, off the cuff remark from his home account, and he's off this week. There's no sinister background to it.
As for Japan. The whole "Japan is internally divided, but externally still viewed as one country" system meant we had to make the emperor's nation un-annexable, as it's loss would break the daimyo system. The downside of this is of course that you cannot conquer Japan before it has been united. "WAD" doesn't mean "Perfect" or "Will never change", but it is working in the way it was designed to do.
However, if you want to talk about the design of Japan further, please make a new thread.
How is remarking that the patch still hasn't implemented something he thinks it should have not talking about the patch?!
Well you could talk about almost anything here by that logic. Try to keep the patch threads to stuff that has changed in the patch, as getting feedback about that is the prime purpose of these threads.