Beta of 5.1 - 10th of May 2011 - Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Johan
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
I got RHQH.
Also, I am getting spammed with 1- stability hits all the time. It's very (VERY) annoying because I'm trying to play as Muscovy and all these stability hits are eating me from the inside. I've never seen that many events occur in 5 years.
Now I got NHQH.
Also, I am getting spammed with 1- stability hits all the time. It's very (VERY) annoying because I'm trying to play as Muscovy and all these stability hits are eating me from the inside. I've never seen that many events occur in 5 years.
Now I got NHQH.
As for the folks talking about the super hordes, I've found that modding the time it takes for a province to flip to 5 years mean time seems to keep them relatively in check.
I am also considering to go back to the 30 march patch, because this is way to many bad events happening.
Or perhaps we're doing what one should do with a new beta, creating a fresh install from 5.0 and installing the new beta rather than just installing the new beta over the old.
Last edited:
I'm disappointed to see that the horde system and other gameplay issues haven't been addressed. Hopefully they will be in future patches (saving the best for last perhaps?).
I think hordes don't even require an elegant fix - just reduce their massive manpower/forcelimit buffs and increase the time it takes for them to capture provinces, or make them more willing to accept enemy offers for peace (tribute).
Seconded. I'd like to see Paradox prioritize gameplay / balance fixes over new features.
That said, I have no insight into the internal Paradox beta process for EU3, and for all I know they may be diligently working behind the scenes to balance out the hordes. There are certainly a lot of variables to consider, so it may take a while.
That works for the Golden Horde and Timurids, but it significantly weakens the eastern hordes. There really isn't a "one size fits all" solution to the horde problem IMO.
You have a point there. Maybe decrease the manpower/forcelimit buffs a little for each province, and increase the MTTH for their claiming of land for each province.
Actually, there is. Simply get rid of the horde mechanic
The sad thing is that while I'm joking it would actually be a massive improvement at this point.
Nero fiddles while Rome burns
PI makes unnecessary tweaks and ignores all the serious problems...
Nothing ever changes...
PI makes unnecessary tweaks and ignores all the serious problems...
Nothing ever changes...
Having that arrogant, self-serving, back-stabbing, holier-than-thou, son of a ***** as an advisor should, indeed, give significant naval bonuses, but also somehow significantly increase the risk for individual big ships to suddenly and unexpectedly sink.
Only if you can give some bonus for coppering them. Then, you get it, and they may sink.
Anything beats an 11 year old admiral, who never commanded a fleet.
Okay I just rage quit my game because it is so ridiculous.
I keep getting stability hits, I'm down to -3 it keeps happening. I am unable to go to over -2. No, just no there is no way I'm playing with this patch.
I keep getting stability hits, I'm down to -3 it keeps happening. I am unable to go to over -2. No, just no there is no way I'm playing with this patch.
Minor issue with the changes to the Burgundy missions for Liege and Brabant - the benefit of achieving the mission no longer appears in the mission panel for those specific missions.
Gamers complain when given universal free invites into the development process...
Nothing ever changes...
Gamers complain when given universal free invites into the development process...
Nothing ever changes...
When did Paradox ask the community to help rework the horde mechanic or other problems that need fixing? They asked for help with new events, a pretty big difference.
- Status