So, we have a big and spooky Lithuania that beats out all crap from poor Muscovy, Ottomans and hordes with it's super-high development. Most ppl that raged about Lithuania being OP pointed that it's territories are too rich and too developed.
But if you shrink Lithuanian provinces to the size of Polish, Lithuania will be roughly as large as Hungary, for instance. In current reality large and rich provinces mean two things:
1. it's much easier to defend them with forts
2. more developed province => more slots for buildings => more tax/trade/manpower generating buildings, all of them adding percentage to province's current power.
If you double the amount of provinces Lithuania has, leaving overall development the same, you will need twice more forts at very least to defend those territories, especially from nasty Ruthenian, Belarussian or Orthodox rebels.
Also adding more provinces would make this region much more fun to play, with prettier borders and more diverse tactical and strategical decisions.
But if you shrink Lithuanian provinces to the size of Polish, Lithuania will be roughly as large as Hungary, for instance. In current reality large and rich provinces mean two things:
1. it's much easier to defend them with forts
2. more developed province => more slots for buildings => more tax/trade/manpower generating buildings, all of them adding percentage to province's current power.
If you double the amount of provinces Lithuania has, leaving overall development the same, you will need twice more forts at very least to defend those territories, especially from nasty Ruthenian, Belarussian or Orthodox rebels.
Also adding more provinces would make this region much more fun to play, with prettier borders and more diverse tactical and strategical decisions.
Last edited:
- 11
- 5