Not exactly true. They just wanted state control of the unions. They busted existing unions because they felt, somewhat justly, that they were merely tools for the political aims of the German communists. Remember, the Nazi hatred of Communists was based on the communist goals of internationalism and multi-culturalism. Not economics.
Private ownership of industries.
Yes and no. Nazis were fine with private ownership as long as the state got what it wanted. There was no guarantee against state collectivization. And this was also related to the fact that Hitler needed the support of the big industrialists for his war aims. State takeover would have been too unwieldy. It was a political decision, not a philisophical one.
I will reply on the assumption you are not being facetious. While many religious people supported the Nazis, to say the Nazis had religious politics defies any serious analysis. I believe it is pretty well established that the Nazi philosophy itself was rather at odds with most any established faith.
This probably comes closest to any tenant that you could ascribe to the American right. Not exactly, but certainly more descriptive of the American right than left.
Unfortunately, both sides of the American political spectrum seek to curtail civil rights. They just differ on which ones to curtail. I would say the Nazis embodied a notion more akin to the American left when it comes to civil rights and social issues. Except for the racist components of their social ideology, you would be hard pressed to find many others that didn't directly map to the American political left, than the right. Gun control, abortion, welfare state, euthanasia, just for starters.
These are common right wing positions in many places besides Nazi Germany. Not exclusive to the right wing but pretty clearly indicative.
True, but as I have just pointed out, most of these didn't apply to Nazis no matter how hardly you try to shove the square peg into the round hole. It's been well documented that in alot of cases where these did apply was mainly for political expediency as indicated by Hitler's writings and modern day research.
A down and dirty summery of the German National Socialist ideology is "Against everything the socialists advocate." Not perfect but pretty close. But the Nazi's had the very politically astute idea that they could put "socialist" in their name to appeal to the listless and powerless. It was a bald faced lie but Nazis were kinda famous for bald faced lies. The loved bald faced lies about as much as they hated socialism. It's understandable that people would be fooled at the time but with hindsight...
No. A down and dirty summary of National Socialism will reveal what I said it will. They held social positions that with the exception of the racial bias they promoted, map directly to the social positions of the modern American left. I mentioned some above. The foreign policy of the Nazis was more akin to what is held by the American right. Fiscally, the Nazis were much more in line with the modern American left. They were big government statists. They believed in state control of the economy, one were business in government intertwined to the point there was no practical difference. This was done by increasing regulation over business. Taxes were heavy, and they had a very entrenched and expansive welfare state. All of these things are anathemas to the American right.
