I never changed it to L1King John said:
Well, i think the current random leader system is good. But suggestions are always welcomed
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Well, i think the current random leader system is good. But suggestions are always welcomed
Hmmm, i guess an average session for the OE. We've got most of Hungary as per the event, and the war with us and France against Austria, Spain and Venice was okay I guess, didn't gain anything, nor lose though (except 2% inflation).l
Since then, been busy with conversions and restoring the army strength. Inflation has risen a lot, though the economy has grown faster.
Since then, been busy with conversions and restoring the army strength. Inflation has risen a lot, though the economy has grown faster.
Edit, Devil was faster ,
It was a good session, lots of wars.
The late start was a bit tiresome though.
Thanks to Tonio, Rezag and Dago for subbing
,It was a good session, lots of wars.
The late start was a bit tiresome though.
Thanks to Tonio, Rezag and Dago for subbing
AI tends to fight long wars, give it time though. 10 years is not very long.admiral drake said:
Hmmm, i guess so.admiral drake said:
Though i want to keep the edits on a minimum, if edits are possible to do in game then no edits.
Austria has such a nice war exhaustion; it shall be fun to fight OE on fair and even conditions. Austria-Spain never started any of these inter-player wars (except when I defend Silesia from BB), so using any other arguments than that you try to make a profit yourselves is not necessary. "Austria is greedy", "Austria is a bad boy", "Austria does not peace Player X" etc.
Great session yeasterday by the way. Though I think things are spiralling out of control right now.
Austria-Spain never started any of these inter-player wars (except when I defend Silesia from BB), so using any other arguments than that you try to make a profit yourselves is not necessary. "Austria is greedy", "Austria is a bad boy", "Austria does not peace Player X" etc. Great session yeasterday by the way. Though I think things are spiralling out of control right now.
Last edited:
its easy and fast to do tho just delete alliance of holstein/mek , then add them to mine takes a min and its not possile to do this ingame as those ai are in seperate wars and those wars are gonna make it so i have to defend them for 20more years frm a different alliance view while they should be in mine alliance if it wasn't for me being afk to get dinner
an easyer and faster solution would be to add me to there alliance as leader
this works and its possible to have more then 1alliance if edited
an easyer and faster solution would be to add me to there alliance as leader
this works and its possible to have more then 1alliance if edited
Chaingun said:Austria has such a nice war exhaustion; it shall be fun to fight OE on fair and even conditions.
Great session yeasterday by the way. Though I think things are spiralling out of control right now.
Austria IS a bad boy though, with a BB rating of 25 or so. Besides you have much of Germany already, that must be stopped.
PJL said:
I don't see why one thing implies the other. :wacko:
BB is the basis of AI wars; it is only a side factor in deciding human wars because you can assume your opponent does not want to lose stability at the risk of civil wars, or he won't annex any minor allies you got because of already high BB.
---------------------------------------------
Anyhow, I don't want to get stuck discussing justification here. We will just see what happens next Sunday.
Last edited:
report for England:
Since start England watched for French ambitions. Our explorer appeared 2 years earlier, so England managed to get control of NA middle coast. At first Lenapes were annexed, after they built minimal forts. Then England switched to protestant for deserved money and back (waiting for event). Then i did mistake by investing in stability (stabcost in catholic times were 1.5x times less than in protestant ones), hoping that stabhit -2 in 1534 will be single one. But later i recieved more stabhits, so these efforts were misery. Totally i wasted about 6-7 years.
Well, for 6 years of life of explorer most of NA coast was explored and we blocked the path to deep in NA for France, though they could place TP in Carolina. Caribbeans were discovered, and we found out both spanish american CoTs, that increased our trade income without any competition. In 1530 after receiving CoT, England started minting, and totally income was raised from 32-35 to 45-49 ducats. One pagan provinces were converted to catholic for 50 ducats to reduce slightly stabcost and activate bailiff. Closer to the end of the session I continued minting over 2.0% inflation, because England -10 deflation event is soon. So all colonies are raised to 3rd level.
As first objective in techs, England is aimed for LT11 not to be easy assaulted in case of French dow. After getting LT11 in jan 1526 i found out France is slightly building galleys, so did the same. Then admiral 3-5-5 and some time later general 2-4-5 came, so this prevented France to think about attacking British Isles. Anyway England finally built more than 100 galleys to feel itself safe. One event with +10 000 cav and ARIS +1 were choosen to save ducats on expensive cavalry.
Now the country is prepared for major action, as planned. Luckily random leaders let England solve the defence problem by itself. Nothing more interesting, just watched on continental war arena.
Since start England watched for French ambitions. Our explorer appeared 2 years earlier, so England managed to get control of NA middle coast. At first Lenapes were annexed, after they built minimal forts. Then England switched to protestant for deserved money and back (waiting for event). Then i did mistake by investing in stability (stabcost in catholic times were 1.5x times less than in protestant ones), hoping that stabhit -2 in 1534 will be single one. But later i recieved more stabhits, so these efforts were misery. Totally i wasted about 6-7 years.
Well, for 6 years of life of explorer most of NA coast was explored and we blocked the path to deep in NA for France, though they could place TP in Carolina. Caribbeans were discovered, and we found out both spanish american CoTs, that increased our trade income without any competition. In 1530 after receiving CoT, England started minting, and totally income was raised from 32-35 to 45-49 ducats. One pagan provinces were converted to catholic for 50 ducats to reduce slightly stabcost and activate bailiff. Closer to the end of the session I continued minting over 2.0% inflation, because England -10 deflation event is soon. So all colonies are raised to 3rd level.
As first objective in techs, England is aimed for LT11 not to be easy assaulted in case of French dow. After getting LT11 in jan 1526 i found out France is slightly building galleys, so did the same. Then admiral 3-5-5 and some time later general 2-4-5 came, so this prevented France to think about attacking British Isles. Anyway England finally built more than 100 galleys to feel itself safe. One event with +10 000 cav and ARIS +1 were choosen to save ducats on expensive cavalry.
Now the country is prepared for major action, as planned. Luckily random leaders let England solve the defence problem by itself. Nothing more interesting, just watched on continental war arena.
Last edited:
So any feedback on the events or the scenario, things to change? Particularly the random events I would like to get some feedback on. I was and still am a bit afraid they are too good... ?
Random events?
How did the random events work out folks?
Spain was relative lucky with random events this session, a few stabhits though.
We recived three excaptional years with total -3 inflation, remember also that excaptional year is set to trigger more often now
I intend to continue using Devils random events, though a small report from each of you regarding this would be appreciated
How did the random events work out folks?
Spain was relative lucky with random events this session, a few stabhits though.
We recived three excaptional years with total -3 inflation, remember also that excaptional year is set to trigger more often now
I intend to continue using Devils random events, though a small report from each of you regarding this would be appreciated
devil said:So any feedback on the events or the scenario, things to change? Particularly the random events I would like to get some feedback on. I was and still am a bit afraid they are too good... ?
Johan - 'These random events are so gay....' :rofl:
Personly, i think they are quite balanced. The bad ones arent as bad as paradox but the good ones arent as good as paradox, so this system work out just fine me thinksdevil said:Particularly the random events I would like to get some feedback on. I was and still am a bit afraid they are too good... ?
Brandenburg will get some edits for next session, add cores and cutting BB.admiral drake said:
Could you post about this cheecho
Brandenburg will get cores on Mecklenburg, Hannover, Bremen, kleves, münster and silesia. There BB will be dropped to 15
Fredrik82 said:Brandenburg will get some edits for next session, add cores and cutting BB.
Could you post about this cheecho
Brandenburg will get cores on Mecklenburg, Hannover, Bremen, kleves, münster and silesia. There BB will be dropped to 15
Can I have cut BB too?
*Poor joke.*EDIT: (Yes I know why they get BB cuts; no need to lecture me about it.)
Fredrik82 said:Brandenburg will get some edits for next session, add cores and cutting BB.
Could you post about this cheecho
Brandenburg will get cores on Mecklenburg, Hannover, Bremen, kleves, münster and silesia. There BB will be dropped to 15
he did forceannex several ai tho should he get such a big boost in bb ?