Aztecs -- I called it!

[Maria Theresa]

Based on the responses in the dlc thread you shouldn't have reminded people that it was your idea People here will now punish you by sacrificing you to the Aztec gods

 

[Alexandre_007]

Oh... God... Why? D:
i like fantasy scenarios and all that... BUT there are some jubjects that really are more plausible and are totally doable in the game, like playing as pagans, or republics, or theocracies.
D:

 

[WankoStankins]

Hooray for Aztecs!!

I think it's going to be very, very fun.

And besides. To all you spoiled history fan brats: You got your "historic" DLC only two weeks ago. So: STFU!

What's so bad about a fun DLC that brings in $$$$$$ ? You'll get your pagan DLC eventually.

Hey, admins! This guy just called us history fans spoiled brats and told us to STFU! Could you please give him a warning that insults are not tolerated here? I thank thee.

 

[Comradebot]

There's only supposed to be 2 big dlc left, this aztec thing is one of them. So pagan dlc, then nothing else? No cadet dynasties or college of cardinals I guess. I accept this with open arms.

IF YOU WOULD LEARN TO READ

You would know they've already stated that the Aztec DLC is NOT one of the "major" DLCs.

 

[n000b]

Lol, you guys need to chill. Don't rage about a funny little DLC you don't even have to buy.

 

[grumphie]

Hooray for Aztecs!!

I think it's going to be very, very fun.

And besides. To all you spoiled history fan brats: You got your "historic" DLC only two weeks ago. So: STFU!

What's so bad about a fun DLC that brings in $$$$$$ ? You'll get your pagan DLC eventually.

beacuse this fun DLC could also have been a reasonable fun dlc. improved crusades and the like. heck, we could have something like vikings invading fromt eh seas. anything but smething as historical impossible as aztecks in 1300 attacking formt eh sea with horses. theyd been annialated by european powers just because of the fact hat you simply cant send a fighting ready 100k army over the sea in that era.

 

[Veldmaarschalk]

Hey, admins! This guy just called us history fans spoiled brats and told us to STFU! Could you please give him a warning that insults are not tolerated here? I thank thee.

I would advise you to calm down for a moment !

You do know that you are getting all worked up about a little, optional thing people can buy if they want to.

 

[Sarius1997]

looks like everyone n Paradox Interactive is already drunk. But i´ll be too in a couple of hours, and the idea is fun. So i´m looking forward to it. And i tell everyone, either like it, or don´t buy it.

 

[Dracko81]

There's only supposed to be 2 big dlc left, this aztec thing is one of them. So pagan dlc, then nothing else? No cadet dynasties or college of cardinals I guess. I accept this with open arms.

AFAIK, we've never said anything about how many DLCs we would be doing. We have ideas to last for quite a few. However, Sunset Invasion does not count as a major DLC or expansion.

Just so you know.

 

[1zarathustra1]

Well I guess let us make this thread the anti-fantasy DLC thread since other threads are not allowed.

No to this kind of DLC in the future.

+1

 

[Darkgamma]

CK2 is a rather new game, and the DLC system is a rather new thing - people, you should totally enjoy this.

 

[WankoStankins]

CK2 is a rather new game, and the DLC system is a rather new thing - people, you should totally enjoy this.

You're right. I hope this DLC is a success so that paradox can make all other sorts of fantastic implausible scenarios

 

[Darkgamma]

I actually hope that's the case, too.

 

[n000b]

Well I guess let us make this thread the anti-fantasy DLC thread since other threads are not allowed.

No to this kind of DLC in the future.

+1

-1
Probably not gonna buy this one, but I do want paradox to release as many DLC's as possible to this game. More content in any form, fantasy or historical plausible, is very much welcome, in my humble and honest opinion.

I don't even get why peoble would be mad at stuff like this, just be happy that the game gets so much support.

 

[WankoStankins]

I actually hope that's the case, too.

Oh, nice A fellow anti-history guy. Let us be allies in the coming fight against those foolish history enthusiasts, ha, who wants historical games anyway

 

[Darkgamma]

I'm not anti-history, I actually enjoy having fun.
It's fun to have fun.

 

[WankoStankins]

I'm not anti-history, I actually enjoy having fun.
It's fun to have fun.

Oh, a fellow funny loving guy I agree, let us have fun with Aztecs.

 

[Darkgamma]

A facepalmish feeling suddenly becomes me...

 

[OrdepNM]

Agreed, but I do not think Doomdark literally meant that it did not affect the schedules. I would rather guess he meant it took up so few man days that it does not matter on the larger time scale. Now this is a guess from my part but this is the explanation which makes the most sense.

EDIT: Improved grammar.

Well, if this is something the programmers cooked up during some particulary idle set of days, like while waiting for 1.07 and LoR feedback to pile up, before they begun working in a patch, than that certainly applies. At the end of the day, I guess only insiders can properly established under what context this dlc was developed. Altough I dont subscribe to the idea that this dlc is such a non factor as its been said, I can see it as being beningn enough where PI decided the harm to the core game development was minimal enough.

Tbh I think there might have been some gun jumping from my end. Im starting to believe this dlc may at least be close to neutral in its effect on the core game development. Guess Ive spent too much time telling people to swing those hammers faster and harder and I'm slightly out of touch with more creative development processes (disclaimer: I dont actually tell people to swing hammers, but deadlines are very important in my line of work.)

 

[WankoStankins]

A facepalmish feeling suddenly becomes me...

Really? Me too We're really on the same level you and I