-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hi all
Well great session last night , going from 1936 to 1939 march in 3.5 hours still was a little fast and my thinking is that with all the pausing from lag and 2 crashes ,down 1 speed would have got there in the same time LOL .
Will need speed at no faster then BN for about 2 weeks next session so i can get germany trades up and running , AS any faster the trades are changing by the time i get to it , with lag etc . Once i have trades up again then we can go up again .
Then will need to slow down again When about 3 weeks away from war getting units into place.
Dennis <gunships>
ps boof and myself can play most times but not around 5 pm to 7pm as that is dinner time with family .I am alway in msn or icq . message me anytime .
Well great session last night , going from 1936 to 1939 march in 3.5 hours still was a little fast and my thinking is that with all the pausing from lag and 2 crashes ,down 1 speed would have got there in the same time LOL .
Will need speed at no faster then BN for about 2 weeks next session so i can get germany trades up and running , AS any faster the trades are changing by the time i get to it , with lag etc . Once i have trades up again then we can go up again .
Then will need to slow down again When about 3 weeks away from war getting units into place.
Dennis <gunships>
ps boof and myself can play most times but not around 5 pm to 7pm as that is dinner time with family .I am alway in msn or icq . message me anytime .
I want to get it right , so we are going to end up with alot of little 1 and 2 and 3 air group as eg 1 new air base can only have 1 plane there .
1.So for Axis attacking into poland easy , will have the numbers
2.But attacking into france will have to spilt groups up into right amonuts per air field number .
3 France vs UK homeland easy as air base are mostly 10
4 Russia with alot of 1 air field will make it little slower get big number up and attacking running away troop at the right time . as if a 1 air unit vs 18 or 36 russia inf running away that 1 air group will near be killed .<if it hits before the rest get there .> 1air vs 36 inf air unit shot to shit LOL .
I think 2 per air base might work before . as eg you might have 8 air base with 8 fighters and 8 bombers witch is a good mix .as we all know BOMBER without fighter cover are dead meat .
And 1 per year ? why that long >? in history USA biuld air field in weeks <that would fly there biggest BOMBERS>
How about 1 air field MADE each month per province .and Fighter at the time of ww2 could land even in a field with cows.
Even if EG . germany attacked into russia biulding air fields as they went ,big numbers of big air field would not be working till next year at best.
But i do like the thinking around it all . <more real > but i think this is real when you look at it from 1940s times.
1.So for Axis attacking into poland easy , will have the numbers
2.But attacking into france will have to spilt groups up into right amonuts per air field number .
3 France vs UK homeland easy as air base are mostly 10
4 Russia with alot of 1 air field will make it little slower get big number up and attacking running away troop at the right time . as if a 1 air unit vs 18 or 36 russia inf running away that 1 air group will near be killed .<if it hits before the rest get there .> 1air vs 36 inf air unit shot to shit LOL .
I think 2 per air base might work before . as eg you might have 8 air base with 8 fighters and 8 bombers witch is a good mix .as we all know BOMBER without fighter cover are dead meat .
And 1 per year ? why that long >? in history USA biuld air field in weeks <that would fly there biggest BOMBERS>
How about 1 air field MADE each month per province .and Fighter at the time of ww2 could land even in a field with cows.
Even if EG . germany attacked into russia biulding air fields as they went ,big numbers of big air field would not be working till next year at best.
But i do like the thinking around it all . <more real > but i think this is real when you look at it from 1940s times.
I really like that rule about the air Gunships! Forces Germany to buy airbases and takes the big unrealistic air stack out of the picture. Nice!
IIRC what we decided on was to just change the squadron sizes to eight instead of four.
I'll be around for the next few hours, if the crew happens to come together, otherwise I should be around tomorrow night starting about 1 AM CET/ 7PM EST.
I'll be around for the next few hours, if the crew happens to come together, otherwise I should be around tomorrow night starting about 1 AM CET/ 7PM EST.
so we meet wednesday at 1 CET ? Earlier is possible for me too.
about airbase rule we tested it it works quite well,1 for each year is good enough to avoid artificial mass airbases builds in each important place taken or else.One a month mean 12 new airbases a year !That is hell too much.The player have to choose very wisely the prov in which he will produce his airbases.
Btw if you remember we have choosen switching to 8 max air sizes stacks without air rule.
about airbase rule we tested it it works quite well,1 for each year is good enough to avoid artificial mass airbases builds in each important place taken or else.One a month mean 12 new airbases a year !That is hell too much.The player have to choose very wisely the prov in which he will produce his airbases.
Btw if you remember we have choosen switching to 8 max air sizes stacks without air rule.
Ok see you then ..
I talked to king and boof both would like to make it 8 air stacks and unlimited air units per number of air fields .I am ok with that aswell for this game anyway .
Other than that ,we are all looking forward to battle next session ..
I talked to king and boof both would like to make it 8 air stacks and unlimited air units per number of air fields .I am ok with that aswell for this game anyway .
Other than that ,we are all looking forward to battle next session ..
extra session tonight
3rd session Wednesday 16 0.30 CET, 20 sept 39 ingame
GER : Gunships
ITA : Boof
USSR : King John
UK : Hiensen
3rd session Wednesday 16 0.30 CET, 20 sept 39 ingame
GER : Gunships
ITA : Boof
USSR : King John
UK : Hiensen
Last edited:
Hi all ,,
What time is that for us ??? mate ???
I cannot play tomrrow if the weather is good here as i have to do some conceteing and the house .. but it still raining so we will play it by ear ok .
That time today was good for us .
Dennis <gunships>
What time is that for us ??? mate ???
I cannot play tomrrow if the weather is good here as i have to do some conceteing and the house .. but it still raining so we will play it by ear ok .
That time today was good for us .
Dennis <gunships>
Ready for today ? 27 sept 39 ingame, session at 17 pm EST/23 CET/4 am aussie time, am I wrong ?
GER : Gunships
ITA : Boof
JAP : Fearless Dylan
UK : Hiensen
USSR : King John
USA : Sandino
GER : Gunships
ITA : Boof
JAP : Fearless Dylan
UK : Hiensen
USSR : King John
USA : Sandino
Italian player gave up, so I'm looking for a new ITA, I made some agreements with german player so you don't have to woryy about your homeland
i might be interested its 21.15 GMT here now what time r u starting and how often do u play, what times etc?
are u guys using any mods?
are u guys using any mods?
we start in 30 min
CET= GMT+1
we use KKCW mod just go to your doomsday files/db/misc.txt/maximum of air sizes stacks
it says 4 u change it to 8
that's all
CET= GMT+1
we use KKCW mod just go to your doomsday files/db/misc.txt/maximum of air sizes stacks
it says 4 u change it to 8
that's all
ive noticed that some of yout game sessions have started at 22.00 CET and later which is a bit late for me to start