I would prefer attachable motorization. Infantry, Mot.Infantrie and even Mech.Infantry fight in the same way, unmounted. They are not different soldiers , like Marines or mountain Infantry. The only diffrence is that they are equipped diffrent.
So when so start an 36, in most cases you just have the option to built normal infantry. When you can research Mot.Infantry you have to built up totally new unexperienced units, instead of just giving your best units a better transportantionsystem.
In some cases I also had to disband some of the old experienced infantry, in order to get a more mobilized army.
Attachable motorization would lead to some good advancements.
1. You don't lose experienced soldiers and you can use them with the best equipment.
2. If you lack of oil you can detach the motorization and use your infantry as a normal one.
3. Motorization could be goods to trade with smaller countries or countries which usually don`t have the ability to produce great amount of motorization like China. Also you could simulate the help the allieds gave the SU, because a lot of the trucks the sowjets used were produced by the US.
So when so start an 36, in most cases you just have the option to built normal infantry. When you can research Mot.Infantry you have to built up totally new unexperienced units, instead of just giving your best units a better transportantionsystem.
In some cases I also had to disband some of the old experienced infantry, in order to get a more mobilized army.
Attachable motorization would lead to some good advancements.
1. You don't lose experienced soldiers and you can use them with the best equipment.
2. If you lack of oil you can detach the motorization and use your infantry as a normal one.
3. Motorization could be goods to trade with smaller countries or countries which usually don`t have the ability to produce great amount of motorization like China. Also you could simulate the help the allieds gave the SU, because a lot of the trucks the sowjets used were produced by the US.
Upvote
0