Armageddon scenario.

[Zardnaar]

Has anoone here played this? I've had a look at it and noticed that all sides ave the same amount of IC. However how does it work in regard to tech teams, and geographical advantages? Is any faction beter than the others. Are you better off with Australasia for example or would you not have enough transports for example. What about those nations located in heavy jungle and mountain terrain. Seems they would have a large advantage. India only get 130 odd IC?

Also whats the difference between Armageddon and the Abyss scenarios?

 

[son of liberty]

Has anoone here played this?

Yes.

I've had a look at it and noticed that all sides ave the same amount of IC. However how does it work in regard to tech teams, and geographical advantages? Is any faction beter than the others. Are you better off with Australasia for example or would you not have enough transports for example. What about those nations located in heavy jungle and mountain terrain.

For location and terrain I say the Libertadores(sp?). Australasia has terrible manpower. Prussia and the Cossacks are surrounded by enemies. PRRS and Euro Soviets have their capitals on islands, safe but need tons of convoys. Tech teams are pretty well matched with some glaring exceptions. For example the Libs have no nuclear team, until after they take the Confederates and/or USA anyway.

Also whats the difference between Armageddon and the Abyss scenarios?

Arm starts with a world war in progress. Abyss gives roughly 6 months or so.