Are long term production line underpowered?

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Zauberelefant

woke commie
18 Badges
Oct 26, 2011
1.792
1.624
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Darkest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
It's a good thing Sherman's and F2's were not around in North Africa until they both were. Thus fulfilling its role as a stopgap measure.

I never said it wasn't a flaw. I said the Sherman wasn't designed because of the M3's flaws not because it didn't have flaws. And that the terrain they were fighting in mitigated these flaws. The Sherman was being designed since the fall of France. The M3 was an early prototype Sherman chassis that they strapped a hull gun onto because they needed a 75mm. It did what it needed to do, when it needed to do it.
But you are wrong on one thing: the desert isn't flat. The 75mm in the hull was an actual drawback of the M3, especially against long range AT guns, Marder tank hunters or the 88. But even in tank combat, a sponson mounted gun is a disadvantage. However, better having the M3 than nothing at all.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: