The Sealed Letter Carried by Cardinal Banastre
Your Holiness,
Cardinal Banastre was most insistent that he travel to the Lateran to pay homage and know your will when we both heard the good news of your ascension to the Papal Throne. I have asked him to pass on my personal regards and look forward to the day when I can leave England to pay proper Christian homage to you myself.
The reasons why I cannot leave England for the moment are not pleasant. The cowardly Duke of Lancaster has raised a huge army against me, and has persuaded several of the foremost duchies and earldoms of my realm to similarly betray me.
I ask of Your Holiness that you condemn this rebellion, so that I may go into battle knowing that I do God's will, and not just that of those nobles who remain loyal to the Crown.
There are those who say that my claim to the throne is the bogus one, and that I am the traitor to be deposed. I intend to prove these people wrong in this very missive.
I am the first to confess that my family and our allies used means that could only be described as less than Christian in our deposition of the Lancastrian child King John. Indeed, I have asked Cardinal Banastre for penance for these sins and have served such. However, I have not committed these acts without feeling they were justified.
I submit to Your Holiness that the House of Lancaster's claim to the throne, from Henry Bolingbroke to the present day, is entirely invalid. It is known that Henry Bolingbroke - later Henry IV - deposed Richard II, who was rightful King of England, being the grandson of Edward III via his first son, Edward of Woodstock, the Black Prince, who predeceased him.
What Bolingbroke did permanently violated the noble tradition of kinghood in England. It is certain that he was of royal blood, since he was the son of John of Gaunt, Edward III's third son. However, Your Holiness, surely it stands to reason that this does not give the House of Lancaster the right to depose the reigning king simply because they did not like him!
Now I come to the reason why I feel my claim is valid. My father, the Duke of York and another Edward, is directly related via his mother, Anne; via Anne's father, Roger, Earl of March; via Roger's mother, Philippa; to, finally, Philippa's father, Lionel, Duke of Clarence, who was Edward III's second son. It is by our direct descendance from my great ancestor Lionel that I feel my claim is valid, and more strong than that of the House of Lancaster, who can only claim descendance through a more junior son of Edward III.
This is where I feel the House of Lancaster has done serious wrong and why our House has done right by the Church's standards.
Cardinal Banastre even quoted to me a passage from the Bible in Leviticus which settled my doubts that our actions, whilst unpleasant, were excusable and even necessary.
OOC: written in Latin:
And in case a man should cause a defect in his associate, then just as he has done, so should it be done to him. Fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; the same sort of defect he may cause in the man, that is what should be caused in him.
I hope your Holiness can forgive my arrogance in quoting the Bible to a man who is clearly more learned in the Holy Book, but it is this passage that has been in my mind and keeping my hand steady as I have steered England towards justice and peace.
Holiness, I ask for your help in breaking the stalemate between myself and my foes. With your blessings upon my endeavours, I can expect the loyalty of my nobles with greater confidence. As loathe as I am to ask of it, and if it is your will that it be so, an excommunication upon the House of Lancaster and its allies would, without doubt, have even greater effect.
I am your humble servant.
By his own hand,
Your Holiness,
Cardinal Banastre was most insistent that he travel to the Lateran to pay homage and know your will when we both heard the good news of your ascension to the Papal Throne. I have asked him to pass on my personal regards and look forward to the day when I can leave England to pay proper Christian homage to you myself.
The reasons why I cannot leave England for the moment are not pleasant. The cowardly Duke of Lancaster has raised a huge army against me, and has persuaded several of the foremost duchies and earldoms of my realm to similarly betray me.
I ask of Your Holiness that you condemn this rebellion, so that I may go into battle knowing that I do God's will, and not just that of those nobles who remain loyal to the Crown.
There are those who say that my claim to the throne is the bogus one, and that I am the traitor to be deposed. I intend to prove these people wrong in this very missive.
I am the first to confess that my family and our allies used means that could only be described as less than Christian in our deposition of the Lancastrian child King John. Indeed, I have asked Cardinal Banastre for penance for these sins and have served such. However, I have not committed these acts without feeling they were justified.
I submit to Your Holiness that the House of Lancaster's claim to the throne, from Henry Bolingbroke to the present day, is entirely invalid. It is known that Henry Bolingbroke - later Henry IV - deposed Richard II, who was rightful King of England, being the grandson of Edward III via his first son, Edward of Woodstock, the Black Prince, who predeceased him.
What Bolingbroke did permanently violated the noble tradition of kinghood in England. It is certain that he was of royal blood, since he was the son of John of Gaunt, Edward III's third son. However, Your Holiness, surely it stands to reason that this does not give the House of Lancaster the right to depose the reigning king simply because they did not like him!
Now I come to the reason why I feel my claim is valid. My father, the Duke of York and another Edward, is directly related via his mother, Anne; via Anne's father, Roger, Earl of March; via Roger's mother, Philippa; to, finally, Philippa's father, Lionel, Duke of Clarence, who was Edward III's second son. It is by our direct descendance from my great ancestor Lionel that I feel my claim is valid, and more strong than that of the House of Lancaster, who can only claim descendance through a more junior son of Edward III.
This is where I feel the House of Lancaster has done serious wrong and why our House has done right by the Church's standards.
Cardinal Banastre even quoted to me a passage from the Bible in Leviticus which settled my doubts that our actions, whilst unpleasant, were excusable and even necessary.
OOC: written in Latin:
And in case a man should cause a defect in his associate, then just as he has done, so should it be done to him. Fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; the same sort of defect he may cause in the man, that is what should be caused in him.
I hope your Holiness can forgive my arrogance in quoting the Bible to a man who is clearly more learned in the Holy Book, but it is this passage that has been in my mind and keeping my hand steady as I have steered England towards justice and peace.
Holiness, I ask for your help in breaking the stalemate between myself and my foes. With your blessings upon my endeavours, I can expect the loyalty of my nobles with greater confidence. As loathe as I am to ask of it, and if it is your will that it be so, an excommunication upon the House of Lancaster and its allies would, without doubt, have even greater effect.
I am your humble servant.
By his own hand,
Edmund Rex
Last edited: