Like what? Fire is so important for our civilization...as is the...well...thumb and both wouldn't exist for creatures under water. There might be ocean worlds full of life out there, but intelligent life that reaches an industrial state? That is very unlikely to happen for a planet like Earth (we should probably consider ourselves an accident). For an ocean world it seems infeasible. How would they use metal? How would they prepare food in such a way, that it can sustain a large brain?
.
There are many plausible mechanisms by which an aquatic intelligence can accumulate energy from natural sources, practice the chemistry needed to transform, concentrate, and control it. Therefore the answer is yes: an aquatic civilization could conduct space travel.
It may have been a very different experience then our own. Maybe relying on organic technologies more then inorganic. Or a combination of the two!
There are many plausible mechanisms by which an aquatic intelligence can accumulate energy from natural sources, practice the chemistry needed to transform, concentrate, and control it. Therefore the answer is yes: an aquatic civilization could conduct space travel.
Aquatic species reaching space is highly improbable, for the reasons stated above, and the debate around why it is so has been quite fascinating.
But I'd also like to point out that we're talking about a fictional universe where ~1/6 of all sentient species can be expected to be sentient fungi. Aquatic species, I think, hit the same region of improbable-but-cool.
Well even an aquatic species could move the rocket out of the water before setting off.
An aquatic species lives underwater. If they can live on both the surface and water, doesn't that make them amphibious?Just because they're aquatic doesn't mean they can't build outposts and ship-building factories on the surface.
EDIT: Ninja'd.
if we are talking about creature that can't leave the water even for short time (like a fish)
they can't melt metals, most of the chemistry we know won't work underwater, and they can't use electricity (how will they even discover it?)
They could wear a suit?An aquatic species lives underwater. If they can live on both the surface and water, doesn't that make them amphibious?
or a fish-like race that use eels as energy source in power plants?!What if they're highly evolve descendants of the electric eel?![]()
They'd need an enormous setup on land to be able to launch a rocket. It seems incredibly inconvenient to have to do so much fine, detailed work with them wearing the equivalence of a space suit. Not to mention the issues that would result from needing to provide at least some sort of aquatic breathing apparatus on the ship.They could wear a suit?
Play as amphibic, you come out of the water only to speak to this weird-dry-air-breathing aliensA couple of my playthroughs, I am roleplaying as being an aquatic species. So I guess it is whether or not your power of imagination is superior to fish-tank diplomacy screen.
More difficult doesn't mean impossible. First they'd need to colonize land areas, then slowly they'd learn about how stuff works groundside. Possibly over thousands of years, but there's time.They'd need an enormous setup on land to be able to launch a rocket. It seems incredibly inconvenient to have to do so much fine, detailed work with them wearing the equivalence of a space suit. Not to mention the issues that would result from needing to provide at least some sort of aquatic breathing apparatus on the ship.
Octopuses are pretty damn bright and excellently equipped to use tools. They are an aquatic race yet they can survive for a short period on land. It wouldn't take a great leap for them to have been just a bit smarter. They do copy each other and learn, they could have been more social.Another thing that should be considered is that the vast majority of life on earth is in the water, but the most intelligent species on earth lives on land, as do the majority of tool-using animals.
While the sample size is pretty small compared to life overall, this does suggest to some extent that intelligent life is more likely to develop on land than in the ocean.
I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on the reasons why this might be. While human technology is impossible underwater, a hypothetical aquatic civilization would have very different technology, and in any case humans evolved modern levels of intelligence long before developing anything recognizable as technology. However, it may be that there is less evolutionary incentive for intelligence in the ocean; almost all tool-using animals are animals which take close care of their young, teach them how to use tools, and which maintain permanent or semi-permanent nests and homes. Both of these tasks are far rarer among aquatic animals, probably due to ecological concerns such as the enormous sizes of marine predators (who themselves have little incentive to develop intelligence when they are already dominant predators) and the lack of good nesting sites outside of coral reefs and kelp forests, both of which are too confining for organisms large enough to support sentience.