I have no reservations regarding ck2's state on release. Given the extensive beta streaming and other coverage i see no reason to except anything else.
this game could have been released back in november of last year if they really wanted and THAT version would be full of bugs and crashes. the fact they have delayed until mid feburary 2012 is an indication paradox is taking QA seriously. so my advice would be to do what i did and just preorder. i got 2 free DLCs as well which was nice!
I have access to the preview version, and I have never had any crashes, freezes or whatsoever. The game is very stable, and the current version is well balanced. Of course, I still have a lot of ideas that could be added. (Cardinals,...) But hey... That way they could keep on adding stuff and never actually release it. I'm sure the game will be expanded a lot in the future through expansions and DLCs.
LOL! Well if that is your opinion then by all means withhold on CK2 too. But I think you are confusing what "playable" means.Vic2 was outright unplayable on Day 1. You couldn't make it past 1870 without close to a million rebels rising up, and it only got worse as time progressed. Honestly, I would recommend waiting on CK2. Vic2 sucked for a while, but once patched, its a great game, and I feel that a lot of people are going to experience that Swords of the Stars 2 feeling when they start playing CK2.
After playing the demo i can tell you you dont have to have any worries.
Watch the preview videos and read the posts of people who have the preview version of the game. It's pretty much unanimous that the game is very stable. Also, you kind of have to buy it now if you want to get that "early adopter" bonus for people who pre-order.
The demo is both enticing and persuasive. It would be a good thing indeed if this type of release and beta-testing were to become the Paradox modus operandi going forward, eh?