any official comment on In-Kingdom Figthing?

[unmerged(2456)]

As i said Royal Prerogative would have to have a very massive negative loyalty penalty, like -10 or -15%, atleast with the current system.

As to realms revolting, i think if the chance is lowered for the AI to quite small and humans its higher it would be okay. I don't like seeing stuff only happen for humans period if at all possible.

 

[unmerged(18148)]

If I am not mistaken, when someone who is part of your domain (whether directly, or through a Duke if you are a King) rebels, you get a claim on their lands automatically. That being the case, nothing would change under the scheme you outlined above.

But a vassal that declares war on another vassal isn't really rebelling nor declaring independence.

 

[unmerged(18148)]

Any other comments about the laws thing? Maybe under Feudal Contract liege intervention should be harder (raising the cost of the claim against his vassal)?

 

[unmerged(18148)]

I've seen these in laws.txt:

ban_private_warfare (Feud CBs doesn't appear)
allow_private_warfare (Feud CBs appear in standard fashion)
oppose_private_warfare (Feud CBs appear, but cost prestige to initiate)

Any info/comments about?

 

[unmerged(2037)]

Which goes back to what has been said since EU2: I paid for "the Conquerers" add-on to Age of Empires II. I paid for the "Play the World" add-on for CivIII. I paid for every "the Sims" add-on ever. I pay a monthly fee to a website that lets me download new clothes for my Sims to wear.

I'll pay for "Crusader Kings: The Art of Intrigue" expansion. Especially if I can download it.

Paradox games are just too complex for single project budget. While I suspect there is not going to be CK2 anytime soon, I would certainly buy "datadisk", especially if it was ready to deliver together with Diplomacy to save shipping costs. I am not sure if the demand would be high enough to justify such an undertaking though.