• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
beta 5...........i was still getting 80% TUR dow SER...........so after a few tests I think I have found the solution...........need others to test as well

#
# Mehmed I of the Ottoman Empire AI
#
region = { }
area = { }
expansion = 0
tradingpost = 50
neighbour = 20
enemies = 0
traders = 20
monopoly = 10 #-500
war = -25
ferocity = no
counterreform = no
combat = { BUL VEN ALB }
base = 0.5
front = 5.0
conquer = {
enemy = 5.0
supply = 0.1
distance = 4.0
owner = 3.0 #was 1.0
notsupply = 2.0
base = 7.0
}
garrison = {
fortress = 5.0
strategic = 3.0
size = 1.0
supply = 9.0
war = 8.0
}


I have tested 6 games, and 100% TUR do nothing until the next AI file

Of course if VEN and TUR go to war with this file timespan, it will be very bag for the TUR and the game

NOTE: VEN and TUR did war over salonika in this time (historical) 1424 -1431
 
Better keep BUL as ahistorical revolter to be fought.

Maybe we could lower war value?

OK, try wih BUL in , but the likly hood of a BUL emerging for 9 years is less than 1%

currently score is 13 -1 ...........1 war TUR dow SER in late 1422

to conclude ....it is far better to have TUR war TEK than to war SER.....if TUR must go to war
 
What does it mean for OE setup then?

I will test the VEN addition too.

I am saying is, that if we cannot prevent a war between SER and TUR ( or if they war VEN) then we need TEK to be the sacrificial lamb as this is the best course for the game
 
historical fact

1403 - SER was vassal of TUR

1413 to 1425 - SER was vassal of HUN and TUR

late 1425 - TUR invade SER