comagoosie said:this is looking good, but I don't know exactly why I would want to lower my character's loyalty...that is unless I wanted a civil war, but I don't think I want that
Well, its an action you can do in another country.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Well, its an action you can do in another country.
Sometimes I do. Its nice to get that +1 stab hit, after destroying only 1 general and recapturing 4 provinces. So, if your entire empire is loyal, except for 1 guy, umm, I like +1 stab hit, especially, when its that against paying 2000g in a large empire. :rofl:comagoosie said:this is looking good, but I don't know exactly why I would want to lower my character's loyalty...that is unless I wanted a civil war, but I don't think I want that
that is what I wanted to hearBalor said:
IIRC, no. Something in the back of my mind says no, but I don't have any hard evidence, yet I think I read it somewhere.Sarkiss said:
Sarkiss said:
I believe King (?) said it wasn't looking good at the moment.
But surely, you would want to start a new game to enjoy the benefits?
Quickly, finish your game!
mundi dating
Wasn't there an EU3 mod that had a wife picker? I would imagine that we still want the AI to have some control to keep it a game and keep us guessing, but perhaps one of the outliners could be "families" with available daughters.
Then you could expound on the "family" importance in this game. Keep the "available women" out of the character pool until they are married so you don't know their characteristics. "You marry the family not the girl" my ex's father.
I think most of the changes are great! I think that Naval travel speeds could be a little more realistic. Greece went to Troy in a matter of days, not several weeks and that was 1000 years before this game's naval technology. The current naval speed takes several days just to put to sea and weeks to cross from one area to another.
Also, I found that with 1600+ research points/year I was only 15 years ahead of countries with 10 because of the scale. Perhaps it's a little skewed? In 2008AD, there are still people who bathe in rivers and farm rice with cattle and there are people who have private spacecraft. I think the diversification should be a little greater. Maybe not too much, maybe 30 years? 50? Then when you carry over to the next volume of game play, you may lose a lot of land, but perhaps you gain in the tech race?
I like the idea of dipplo annexation as well, would make the adriatic and agean regions MUCH more formidable.
I think the way to allow "conquering" of gray provinces with low society is that barbarian strenght continues to grow!!! At 10%-80% growth, at 20%-60% growth, at 30-40%growth, at 40-20%, at 50-10%, at 60-5%, at 70-0. It might actually take longer to quell the revolts than to wait and colonize.... but... there are benefits if you can manage the resources. Also, you can assign "conquered" and "colonized" province tags. Colonized would be less effective at raising armies and more effective at raising funds. Conquered would be the opposite and include the risk of a barbarian tribe having a land claim to the place if they settle and create a nation nearby!
Ok, sorry to post so long in this forum, hope the suggestions are helpful.
Wasn't there an EU3 mod that had a wife picker? I would imagine that we still want the AI to have some control to keep it a game and keep us guessing, but perhaps one of the outliners could be "families" with available daughters.
Then you could expound on the "family" importance in this game. Keep the "available women" out of the character pool until they are married so you don't know their characteristics. "You marry the family not the girl" my ex's father.
I think most of the changes are great! I think that Naval travel speeds could be a little more realistic. Greece went to Troy in a matter of days, not several weeks and that was 1000 years before this game's naval technology. The current naval speed takes several days just to put to sea and weeks to cross from one area to another.
Also, I found that with 1600+ research points/year I was only 15 years ahead of countries with 10 because of the scale. Perhaps it's a little skewed? In 2008AD, there are still people who bathe in rivers and farm rice with cattle and there are people who have private spacecraft. I think the diversification should be a little greater. Maybe not too much, maybe 30 years? 50? Then when you carry over to the next volume of game play, you may lose a lot of land, but perhaps you gain in the tech race?
I like the idea of dipplo annexation as well, would make the adriatic and agean regions MUCH more formidable.
I think the way to allow "conquering" of gray provinces with low society is that barbarian strenght continues to grow!!! At 10%-80% growth, at 20%-60% growth, at 30-40%growth, at 40-20%, at 50-10%, at 60-5%, at 70-0. It might actually take longer to quell the revolts than to wait and colonize.... but... there are benefits if you can manage the resources. Also, you can assign "conquered" and "colonized" province tags. Colonized would be less effective at raising armies and more effective at raising funds. Conquered would be the opposite and include the risk of a barbarian tribe having a land claim to the place if they settle and create a nation nearby!
Ok, sorry to post so long in this forum, hope the suggestions are helpful.
Damn, thought the patch would have been out already? What a birthday it would be if it was released this friday.
