- May 6, 2015
- 2.278
- 3.161
20 dollars with 300 graphics DLC all of which cost 2.50 dollars
- 22
- 5
Announcing Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
- Thread starter TotalyMoo
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
20 dollars with 300 graphics DLC all of which cost 2.50 dollars
Yeah, we do need it but it's not coming anytime soon, at least before Hearts of Iron. I agree that Vic 2 is pretty broken game, even though it's fun.
- 6
- 4
Aww yiss more Sejm shenanigans incoming!
Anyway, am I the only one who thought the DLC name was some sort of joke?
Anyway, am I the only one who thought the DLC name was some sort of joke?
- 5
Any localisation in us for parliament name being Senate or House of Representatives?
A date for the release! Will have to keep that weekend free and finish my current campaign (Thats a silk road)
Some awesome features
Cant wait for the next one about subjects!
Id like it if subjects (For support independence) also consider distance from the overload, not just to themselves
Some awesome features
Cant wait for the next one about subjects!
Id like it if subjects (For support independence) also consider distance from the overload, not just to themselves
Going by the feature list, this might be the best DLC yet. Hype, hype, hype!
Also, Dan Carlin's Common Sense anyone?
Also, Dan Carlin's Common Sense anyone?
Wait, development is a DLC feature? Isn't that a huge mechanical shift between the regular game and the DLC? I mean, that would also play havoc with game conversion too.
- 4
I am wondering if it will be ever - now they have CK2 as one of the major titles, which seem to be much more appealing to the wide player-base rather than Victoria so maybe it is not even considered profitable enough. And probably various 'friendly maker' things like EU's NIs won't fit well in Victoria.
I also expected that to be a part of the patch, since it's just as fundamental a change as the new provinces and the reworked map. I'm also surprised that the fortresses aren't mentioned at all in the announcement, since there was basically a whole dev diary about them.
- 6
HoI is more complicated than EU or CK, yet it's getting a sequel. I believe that V3 is very much a reasonable prospect, albeit one set in a distant future.
The changes to peace treaties weren't mentioned either. Thy just didn't mention some of the patch content.
- 10
Same for me. Definitely getting this one.
Good job, Paradox. Looking forward to more politics.
- 4
It is the patch feature. The lists during announcements tend to name most prominent features between both the DLC and the patch (as the two together make the expansion).
- 1
HoI3 seems to be much more popular than Victoria 2 though. I don't know if there are sales figures, but counting forum sections:
Victoria 2 (2010): 400k messages;
HOI3 (2009): 900k messages;
Plus, it has clear setting: it is WW2, you pick a country and chill (if you are USSR/USA/Allies) or trying hard (Germany/Axis) to acheive some defined goals in the concrete event. I think it is understandable why in case of Victoria there would be less people interested.
It can be even better than missed changes. Like when you've read the changelog, started playing on Ironman and then SUDDENLY some thing directly contradicts with what was in the changelog.
This is the pessimist in me coming out, but the changed military dynamics (fewer, but more important forts) didn't get in the announcement. Hope that doesn't mean it's getting held back.
- 10
- 1