OHgamer said:Rule of thumb is that the more provinces a state will have, the more of an industrial base it can develop by drawing on larger number of POP groups in each province.
England thus needs to be more provinces in the North, not fewer, to better emulate the rapid industrialization in the North of England. Southwest England, on the other hand, should have not as many since it was much less industrialized. Lancashire should be 2 provinces - Liverpool and Manchester - not having a Liverpool province would be a crime for this period, since it was THE major UK port of the period, while Manchester was the fastest growing center of urbanization in the period. Combine those with a Carlisle province as well for the rural north of Lancashire.
I'm also thinking of reworking Yorkshire into three provinces so that the industrial expansion in the Northeast can also be better illustrated : Provinces centered on Sheffield, Leeds and Hull
Similarly, Ulster having 3 allows it to be more of an industrial center (and it was the industrial center of Ireland in this period). So Ulster should stay at 3 provinces, not drop to 2.
Splitting off Argyll as a separate province in Scotland, at the expense of Dundee, seems wrong for the 19th C - Dundee would have been of more economic importance as a province center than the Argyll region. Same with having a separate province for the far north of the Highlands, just not making a lot of sense in terms of the economic development of Scotland in the Victoria period (or the 20th C)
And having a single border province in Scotland I think makes more sense. Were Scotland to be played as a separate nation in game, from gameplay POV it makes more sense to have a border province to guard the approaches to the Lowlands than have the ability to march right into Edinburgh.
Okay - to be frank, I was less than inspired when I got to it, less than I thought I would (and I had to go before I could write a detailed explanation of the reasons behind my proposals), besides a general feeling that something was off with the geography of Britain. And with 30 provinces, representing all of England's important centers will have to be combined with dropping off some geographic expediency then - maybe East Anglia could be combined as a single province, similarly with Cornwall and Devon (in both cases, the ressource base would be the same and the population isn't that high, but that makes for rather large-ish provinces for the area) to have a Sheffield (south Yorkshire) and Liverpool (oddly-shaped, though, unless I combined Lancashire with Cheshire - Chester was, at the time, in comparative decline...) provinces. Dropping Durham as well, might have been a better idea.
And as someone who once did a Seeloewe in 1911, I've seen the British AI waste corps after corps trying to get through Dumfries province; that was a mainly strategic concern. Then again, it seems like the British AI always has Churchill in charge, which by end game makes them thoroughly suicidal.
Perth could be renamed Dundee - I forgot the name Perth would have to go to Australia. It would just require a slight border tweak.
As for the rest, back to the drawing board for reflexion.
Last edited: