Stats
Horribly sorry Frunco, we behaved like bastards
Which most of us are but still this is not right
Horribly sorry Frunco, we behaved like bastards
Which most of us are but still this is not right
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
every cloud has a silver lining, no?
BB has now 14.5 k in treasury and advanced 1 trade level.
i built 2 weapons manus in copper or iron provs (dont remember) before i crashed.
BB has now 14.5 k in treasury and advanced 1 trade level.
i built 2 weapons manus in copper or iron provs (dont remember) before i crashed.
get on icq evil oneMaciejus said:Sorry Fnuco. This example shows how important role plays BB in Animal Farm
OE AAR:
- got instruction on severe gangbang of Spain, which was executed
- then was afk 90% of time for 2,5 hours
- built 27 governors, 36 bailiffs, 107 judjes, 6 wine manus
- send once a merchant to free slot to Austria, some time later once more. When i returned i found OE embargoed. I don`t know which way Brent prefers to think usually, but this action was hardly reasonable. So Austria was steamrolled, until over +70WS.
- Austria refuced 50 ducats peace, so following KJ traditions, i harshly increased my demands and doubled them when steamrolled them - peace was signed for 100 ducats.
- trade increased from 28 to 95 ducats, +1500 total year income (+31%), some deflation, Morocco dipannexed.
- +2 trade, NT18, at the end headed for LT race.
- got instruction on severe gangbang of Spain, which was executed
- then was afk 90% of time for 2,5 hours
- built 27 governors, 36 bailiffs, 107 judjes, 6 wine manus
- send once a merchant to free slot to Austria, some time later once more. When i returned i found OE embargoed. I don`t know which way Brent prefers to think usually, but this action was hardly reasonable. So Austria was steamrolled, until over +70WS.
- Austria refuced 50 ducats peace, so following KJ traditions, i harshly increased my demands and doubled them when steamrolled them - peace was signed for 100 ducats.
- trade increased from 28 to 95 ducats, +1500 total year income (+31%), some deflation, Morocco dipannexed.
- +2 trade, NT18, at the end headed for LT race.
I put together some stats based upon the stats site. We need to get joy from something in this campaign that is haunted by abscences during game time.
I have chosen three end saves, 1534 (my first session), 1683 (the last one) and 1619 (somewhere in the middle).
I have chosen the 6 strongest nations in the 1683 save. I inspect
INC = yearly income
MP = MP pool
∑T = Total tech level
I% = Inflation
To get the "total tech level" I simply added 1 for each NT/LT level and 6 for each infra/trade level (as there are 6 times as many LT/NT levels as there are infra/trade levels).
All numbers have been truncated or rounded to a suitable level.
Nations are presented in alfabethical level.
I have chosen three end saves, 1534 (my first session), 1683 (the last one) and 1619 (somewhere in the middle).
I have chosen the 6 strongest nations in the 1683 save. I inspect
INC = yearly income
MP = MP pool
∑T = Total tech level
I% = Inflation
To get the "total tech level" I simply added 1 for each NT/LT level and 6 for each infra/trade level (as there are 6 times as many LT/NT levels as there are infra/trade levels).
All numbers have been truncated or rounded to a suitable level.
Nations are presented in alfabethical level.
Code:
------ 1534 ------ ------ 1619 ------ ------ 1683 ------
INC MP ∑T I% INC MP ∑T I% INC MP ∑T I%
ENG 1000 40 50 5 3800 110 96 7 6000 125 130 3
FRA 800 113 50 6 3600 180 78 29 7100 200 118 32
O E 2500 266 53 4 3300 350 84 17 6200 370 110 7
POR 1400 40 61 5 3800 38 105 9 9000 42 150 5
RUS 900 130 47 1 3500 290 63 17 4400 275 91 18
SPA 1300 109 57 8 1900 135 90 10 2300 180 121 6
Last edited:
Daniel, it is possible to make automated with manual MP input.
You can look fortress level, number of CCs and shipyards and other inputs.
You can look fortress level, number of CCs and shipyards and other inputs.
Eh, what do you mean Tonio?
And great thanks for subbing. No doubt your weight made John's decision to give up without a fight even easier than did CRT+DotF+Turenne
Imagine, due to all the abscences Turenne only saw action in one war and in this war no opponent dared to face him. What a waste.
And great thanks for subbing. No doubt your weight made John's decision to give up without a fight even easier than did CRT+DotF+Turenne
Imagine, due to all the abscences Turenne only saw action in one war and in this war no opponent dared to face him. What a waste.
Daniel A said:
produce reliable formula as you want to calculate power and you`ll see
Daniel A said:
Poor ghosted Russia. MP actually declined? What's up with that? Income is the same as the previous session.
Ah, now I understand Tonio. I immediately set about to make a preliminary analysis. I will present my results in a new thread.
fraese said:
I do not really know. I was myself quite surprised by this so I started up as RUS this morning and checked but the number was exactly right.
It could have to do with MP from vassals. Did you have a vassal before but not now and are you on comparateively low centralisation?
Daniel A said:
No, Brandenburg's still my vassal and centralization is 10. I should get at least get my 2 dp moves compensation, btw, so I'll take those. I cannot figure out where that MP went, unless someone edited it down for me
Tonio, methinks your stats program needs a slightly more secure access system
For this session I arranged 3 subs (labalag, Mulli and Tonio), for the previous (I think) 2 subs. This session we also had Fnuco subbing BB. Thus 4 subs in a game with 10 slots (not counting NL since it was ghosted).
So, 4 subs was not enough, we still lacked one in NL. Further more, during this session first John and then the sub Tonio were not present for quite some time and Mulli (sub) had to leave after an hour or so. Much of this meant that some of the well-made plans for the session went to naught.
And yes, we could not start at all until one hour after the official starting time.
I for one refuse to put so much work into finding subs as I have been doing lately. If the rest of you (except Fraese) had contributed to finding subs it would have been different but the lot of you appear quite passive in that regard.
We still have not heard from Rinak. He is probably too ashamed to post in this thread. And rightly so.
Billy lost his computer.
We need a NL a Sweden and an OE.
We must get at least two of them I think. And then who knows what other problems we will get the next weekend.
I myself have not missed one second of this game since I signed on the campaign. I have earlier spoken about dedication and I see that in some of you, less in some and almost none in some.
Judging from the percentage of prescence of perms during a session I consider this to be the worst campaign I have ever played in. The percentage must be around 60-70 or so only. I guess most campaigns are around 80%.
However, as always I enjoy playing. But I would have enjoyed it immensly more if we have had 80% or 90% prescence of perms. In Chill4, a carefully selected crew with a few newcomers who turned out to be great, I believe we have had more than 90% prescence. It is not impossible. It all has to do with choosing the right people as perms.
-----------
Personally I believe I will give this campaign only one more chance. If we do not have a good session next weekend with good attendence I see little reason to continue it although things are starting to look bright for France.
It is then probably better that FAL starts up his new Sunday game with a more reliable crew.
So, 4 subs was not enough, we still lacked one in NL. Further more, during this session first John and then the sub Tonio were not present for quite some time and Mulli (sub) had to leave after an hour or so. Much of this meant that some of the well-made plans for the session went to naught.
And yes, we could not start at all until one hour after the official starting time.
I for one refuse to put so much work into finding subs as I have been doing lately. If the rest of you (except Fraese) had contributed to finding subs it would have been different but the lot of you appear quite passive in that regard.
We still have not heard from Rinak. He is probably too ashamed to post in this thread. And rightly so.
Billy lost his computer.
We need a NL a Sweden and an OE.
We must get at least two of them I think. And then who knows what other problems we will get the next weekend.
I myself have not missed one second of this game since I signed on the campaign. I have earlier spoken about dedication and I see that in some of you, less in some and almost none in some.
Judging from the percentage of prescence of perms during a session I consider this to be the worst campaign I have ever played in. The percentage must be around 60-70 or so only. I guess most campaigns are around 80%.
However, as always I enjoy playing. But I would have enjoyed it immensly more if we have had 80% or 90% prescence of perms. In Chill4, a carefully selected crew with a few newcomers who turned out to be great, I believe we have had more than 90% prescence. It is not impossible. It all has to do with choosing the right people as perms.
-----------
Personally I believe I will give this campaign only one more chance. If we do not have a good session next weekend with good attendence I see little reason to continue it although things are starting to look bright for France.
It is then probably better that FAL starts up his new Sunday game with a more reliable crew.
Last edited:
Daniel A said:
I'm of pretty much the same mind here, this campaign has always had a lot of potential and some interesting dynamics, but finding subs and perms has made it a real pain to GM. Hopefully we can get everyone together this weekend. If not, well, I guess people are entitled to vote with their feet in EU as anywhere.
Daniel A said:
We have found the problem and hopefully Ill have it running by this session. Please arrange a sub anyways in case it does not fix. Thanks.
fraese said:
who made you to force start before DU1,5 was over and at rather late timeslot ?