Well, a thing that I enjoyed much in Victoria was politics, but it had some shortcomings. Here is a few thoughts for Vicky2.
- Anarcho-Liberal definitely need a new name. There had been countless confused post in Vicky boards, asking for what they stand for, what they exactly are, etc...
As they are extreme-liberal, sort of guillotine addicts Jacobines, a name like "revolutionnary liberals" would be far better. I know it's hard to name them properly, but anarcho-liberal did provoke so much confusion: "come on... they are anarchists and liberal? How come they transform the state into a dictatorship" etc...
- More deep in governments forms!
Here's how things could be organized, if the engine can handle it: between representative and un-representative regimes.
I mean, in Vicky, we had democracy, and the other ones. For instance, ConMon had de facto a malus regarding immigration whereas life there is politicaly as free as in a constitutionnal republic...
We could have:
-Un-representative governements:
Monarchy, basically as in Vicky 1
Military Republic/Republican Dictatorship. (South-American juntas; Louis-Napoleon "consulate" (between 1851 and 1852))
- Constitutionnal governments:
Constitutionnal monarchy
Constitutionnal republic
-Totalitarian or proto-totalitarian states:
Revolutionnary republic (hello anarcho-liberals!) that could evolve over time towards a republican dictaroship or constitutionnal governement.
Proletarian dictatorship
Fascist dictatorship
These ones would need events to survive, simulating terror and other purges.
We could aslo have some in-between constitutionnal and un-representative:
Limited Monarchy/authoritarian constitutionnal monarchy (like IInd Reich; well you got the picture the mid-step between Ancien Régime and British con-mon)
The same with republic: authoritarian democrats or thing like that, step between dictarorship or revolutionnary republic towards (or from) constitutionnal republic.
- Anarcho-Liberal definitely need a new name. There had been countless confused post in Vicky boards, asking for what they stand for, what they exactly are, etc...
As they are extreme-liberal, sort of guillotine addicts Jacobines, a name like "revolutionnary liberals" would be far better. I know it's hard to name them properly, but anarcho-liberal did provoke so much confusion: "come on... they are anarchists and liberal? How come they transform the state into a dictatorship" etc...
- More deep in governments forms!
Here's how things could be organized, if the engine can handle it: between representative and un-representative regimes.
I mean, in Vicky, we had democracy, and the other ones. For instance, ConMon had de facto a malus regarding immigration whereas life there is politicaly as free as in a constitutionnal republic...
We could have:
-Un-representative governements:
Monarchy, basically as in Vicky 1
Military Republic/Republican Dictatorship. (South-American juntas; Louis-Napoleon "consulate" (between 1851 and 1852))
- Constitutionnal governments:
Constitutionnal monarchy
Constitutionnal republic
-Totalitarian or proto-totalitarian states:
Revolutionnary republic (hello anarcho-liberals!) that could evolve over time towards a republican dictaroship or constitutionnal governement.
Proletarian dictatorship
Fascist dictatorship
These ones would need events to survive, simulating terror and other purges.
We could aslo have some in-between constitutionnal and un-representative:
Limited Monarchy/authoritarian constitutionnal monarchy (like IInd Reich; well you got the picture the mid-step between Ancien Régime and British con-mon)
The same with republic: authoritarian democrats or thing like that, step between dictarorship or revolutionnary republic towards (or from) constitutionnal republic.