Well, I think that those leaders are important and significant to the game, due to the fact that they are somekind of balance of other leaders of their time (Suvorov, Nappy, etc)Javier (Pibe) said:why? it's unfair
Well, I think that those leaders are important and significant to the game, due to the fact that they are somekind of balance of other leaders of their time (Suvorov, Nappy, etc)Javier (Pibe) said:why? it's unfair
They are all random: date, span of time, rank, stats...Mark Dey said:What ranks are the leaders and how long will they live? (random?)
No, I believe that number is ok, so I will need you to give a number to decide how many generals and admirals.Mark Dey said:I'm assuming that there's some sort of cap on the rank though, right? It would look odd to have multiple Monarch leaders running around.
When do you need the decision on how to split the 40 remaining leaders into land & naval?
EDIT: Or do you want a number between zero and forty on how many extra leaders everyone should get?
-Mark
Well, there are quite a number of countries that can complain also about their monarchs (i.e. OE, Spain), but at the end they are not that fundamental, also, if your last monarch has a deathdate of 1795, but there aren't any other one, it will live til the end... so... in short words: nodelosandes said:I wont complain against these (Poland not becoming Prussia) but I’m worried about the historical monarchs of Poland (and of the crapy leaders I get while my neighbours have better, so blucher and frederick should come), it seems that after 1795 there aren’t any more polish monarchs so I would suggest that the last 3 Prussian monarchs take over the country...
Hm, yes, that was the discussion in the previous game, right?.. so, I'm agree with it, at the end OE and Spain managed to survive the beginning without those boosts.. so.. yes.. I'm gonna take them off..Casluerj said:TG,
Considering that we'll have random leaders, that will somehow balance the situation for Spain and OE in the end, I am against the Spain and OE boosts ON. What do you think?
the_genius said:Hm, yes, that was the discussion in the previous game, right?.. so, I'm agree with it, at the end OE and Spain managed to survive the beginning without those boosts.. so.. yes.. I'm gonna take them off..
the_genius said:Well, I think that those leaders are important and significant to the game, due to the fact that they are somekind of balance of other leaders of their time (Suvorov, Nappy, etc)
Yeah, I was studying the leaders that are generate with this tool, and it can appear even a leader with the characteristics of these two (or superior).. so having those random leaders we can scrap that suggestion of putting those guys in Polish file..Javier (Pibe) said:sure, but don't give Fred II or Blucher to Poland or Austria.
the_genius said:Yeah, I was studying the leaders that are generate with this tool, and it can appear even a leader with the characteristics of these two (or superior).. so having those random leaders we can scrap that suggestion of putting those guys in Polish file..
We all know what happened with BB/PRU at the end of ATE1, it was crushed by Russia quite easily even having those excellent leaders, so it's guarantee that a country having or not leaders will be better at the end or at the beginning; also, Poland will have a better core for standing a chance against their enemies. Plus, as I have said before, this random leader thingy improves a lot the number of leaders a country might have; randomly can give some powerful leaders. Plus2 a Poland with german culture can racked up a better MP than BB, due to its size and the possibility of getting Lithuania almost free. Plus3, Poland has a better position by only having huge frontier with Russia only, but BB is practically in a hole between Russia/Sweden/Austria.delosandes said:This country is becoming less attractive every day... I think BB will be much more competitive in the final stages than Poland under these circumstances… I mean crappy monarchs and few crappy leaders while standing in the middle of Europe
the_genius said:We all know what happened with BB/PRU at the end of ATE1, it was crushed by Russia quite easily even having those excellent leaders, so it's guarantee that a country having or not leaders will be better at the end or at the beginning; also, Poland will have a better core for standing a chance against their enemies. Plus, as I have said before, this random leader thingy improves a lot the number of leaders a country might have; randomly can give some powerful leaders. Plus2 a Poland with german culture can racked up a better MP than BB, due to its size and the possibility of getting Lithuania almost free. Plus3, Poland has a better position by only having huge frontier with Russia only, but BB is practically in a hole between Russia/Sweden/Austria.
the_genius said:We all know what happened with BB/PRU at the end of ATE1, it was crushed by Russia quite easily even having those excellent leaders,
The fact that these points are valid means that Poland has a lot of disadvantages in comparison to the rest... even with Prussiathe_genius said:Valid points yeah, but Poland ain't that awful
The northern German nations under one banner makes expansion easier (BB will be able to earn 7 provinces right away)... plus being protestant, small, with rich provinces and good monarchs will boost Prussian tech race and economy (low stab and tech costs)... There is also the fact that Prussia will have more chances of focusing on colonization and trying to conquer those rich Asian COTs while at peace...the_genius said:besides the big ugly factor for BB is his development, due to the fact that it has to expand a lot quickly otherwise will get crushed easily, hurt it's tech race and economy
BB will focus on the northern Germans, polish and Baltic provinces, even it could rack up the polish provinces while the rest fight for Italy, NL, Crimea and the Balkans... Also Sweden should be a threat to Russia this time, we could give them Lithuanian culture in order to expand further more into that area (once they have expanded into Baltic)... BB could get Lithuanian as well and OE could get Polish (once they got Moldavia they could expand there) and Lithuania (once they got Crimea they could expand there)...the_genius said:Plus, as we know, BB will focus again on Germany and will leave again in a plate Lithuania/Poland for Russia, getting us into the situation of having a big guy there
there is no need to have a fight for Germany, we should try to have a fight for Europe... German lands are not the big carrot that attracts everybody’s attention... given that there are a lot of contested areas (NL, Italy, Balkan, Crimea, North Africa, Baltic and Ugric), there is no essential need to have Germany under that situation to have fun too... BTW there aren’t cores over the northern German lands in the save file... only Poland got three, Sweden has none and Austria got only the central German lands...the_genius said:Also, this will leave again the fight for Germany to only two, but with the factor that BB *must* win its part, otherwise it will be sentenced to death. But having Poland/Sweden/Austria fighting for Germany, can prove to have a funnier game due to the fact that for these countries it's expansion ground not its core.