-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
nice aar.... though i am disapointed we didn't get one covering a larger time period. keep it coming
Does anybody know what the "irregulars" that appear on the map are?
Are they the remnants of defeated armies, or guerrilla forces made out of the population?
Are they the remnants of defeated armies, or guerrilla forces made out of the population?
Originally posted by Timothy Ortiz
I think that they're real he posted a screenshot that showed 60k Frenchmen going against 100k Germans.
However I want to know what that tiny yellow country is between Austria-Hungary, Albania, and Serbia?
Montenegro, I think.
Based on the AAR, I would guess that it is the guerilla forces from the population.
Out of curiosity what are the German war aims?
Try to get Spain involved, even if they do nothing the French will have another front across the country from you.
Try to get Spain involved, even if they do nothing the French will have another front across the country from you.
IMO, Sytass ought to force Russia to accept peace by giving away Austrian Galicia in its' entirety. Assuming he's the "alliance leader", I'd guess he could do that. He also should take steps to bring Romania and Bulgaria into his alliance. Looking at it, the Austrian border with Romania is totally unprotected. Once he's done with the Serbs, he could attempt to force the Greeks into allying with him, thus securing his southern flank. Once that is done, Ottomans will be in a secure position to play a role of distractor for the Entente.
Also, why don't we have any updates on the Balkan front and the colonial battlefields?
Also, why don't we have any updates on the Balkan front and the colonial battlefields?
But if he's pursuing historical German war aims he wants to at least annex Russian Poland.
If he's pursuing historical German war aims, I doubt his ability to emerge victorious...given the situation in the west, 1916 might well be the last year of the war. I might be overestimating the AI a bit, though
.
Russia is obviously going to be a far greater threat to Germany in the future than France, especially once it is fully industrialized. Better to cripple Russia now or at least move the border east then wait for Russia to initiate conflict on it's own terms. At least that's what would be my thinking if I was playing the Germans.
how can this be true! yesterday the game wasnt gold and we had no aar! now today everything!hahahahaha
great aar btw!
great aar btw!
It seems Germany is still going to be in a bind as he does not have sufficient numbers to overcome both east and west fronts. Unless a miracle happens, if Germany is still stalemated in 1916, it is in trouble after America enters the war! The 1914 scenario seems to be a real hard play situation for the kaiser. In the grand campaign, I would have preferred to have a full mobilization by three months or more on the allies and hit at least with a 4-1 superiority in every attack. The east can wait and you can hold a static line against the Russians and let them grind with the Austrians for a bit.
Surely he won't provoke the Americans into the war by declaring unlimited Submarine warfare.
I think whoever gets Italy to join the war on their side will win.
Yeah, and this worked splendidly. Who can forget how the capture of the UKraine cities assured victory?
With the hindsight, it seems that his biggest mistake was his failure to commit sufficient troops to the Eastern front in the first place. I'd say that Germany lost its momentum in the West...it might be the time to sue for peace there (if he's not willing to give up Galicia). In either case, Sytass probably faces the only realistic choice of whether to commit himself in full to either of the theaters.