What I really would like to see would be a choice between medium altitude bombing, which would do substantially more damage to industry at the expense of much greater vulnerability to AA fire, versus high altitude bombing, which would do less damage to industry but take less losses to the aircraft from AA fire. In other words, the ability to go "high risk, high reward" in priority situations if/when you have total air superiority or the enemy doesn't have suitable AA defenses, or a slow but steady long-term approach against a better defended enemy. Historically, the medium altitude method was tested, and may have been quite effective, but resulted in unacceptable casualties under the circumstances. Had the circumstances been different, such as Germany not investing as heavily in AA as it did, then that approach might have been a tradeoff or even preferable: less raids needed, but higher casualties per raid.
