What takes precedence in seemingly contradictory pairings? The AI personality or the ruler personality that came with Rights of Man?
Prime example for me: Militarist rulers usually are much more aggressive than other AI personalities. But assume this ruler gets the RoM trait "Calm" which makes a an AI ruler "less likely to start wars". So this seems a bit contradictory to me. So how is this "conflict" solved? Does the AI personality take precedence in calculating the probability of a ruler to declare war or is the "calm" ruler trait/personality the determing factor that this ruler is less likely to declare war? Or third option by making both attributes multiplicative: A calm Militarist is less likely to declare war than a non-calm Militarist, but more likely to go to war than a calm ruler with a different AI personality (Administrator, Diplomat, etc).
This is something I've been curious about for quite some time now and I hope, you can enlighten me.
Prime example for me: Militarist rulers usually are much more aggressive than other AI personalities. But assume this ruler gets the RoM trait "Calm" which makes a an AI ruler "less likely to start wars". So this seems a bit contradictory to me. So how is this "conflict" solved? Does the AI personality take precedence in calculating the probability of a ruler to declare war or is the "calm" ruler trait/personality the determing factor that this ruler is less likely to declare war? Or third option by making both attributes multiplicative: A calm Militarist is less likely to declare war than a non-calm Militarist, but more likely to go to war than a calm ruler with a different AI personality (Administrator, Diplomat, etc).
This is something I've been curious about for quite some time now and I hope, you can enlighten me.