exactly what i had in mind , also posting a post i made in mod34 for HOI2 arma
"Is anyone find that the Nukes from USA too urber frequent ? Also there should have game consquences where you lunch a nuke , for say if your a democracy nation you get decent (something like 40% ) and dictatorship gets lower like 20 % , and you get events where other nations break trade agreements and add your beligerence , and workers / citizen strike where your IC effiecncy lowers etc
also the time to make nukes need to be lowered down much slower , and less powerful (it aint modern H bomb yet) it wiped 30 divisons in one province in one hit lol.....Also the nukes shouldnt permentaly lower the population vaule of the land (i know its realistic to some point) but to gameplay veiw its terriable and adding that to frequent lunch of nukes its game breaking
right now nukes are too cheap and yet powerful and no side effects to users that lunch them lol"
I think - no offense - you don't know much about the real history of WW2.
This wasn't a "let's nuke Japan because they're totally innocent" but rather the other way around. Japan was the only Nation massively using biological and chemical weapons in WW2, even against civilians. Approx. 30 millions got killed in China alone due to their aggressive warfare. The people in the other conquered regions weren't treated better. Their attack on Pearl Harbor was just the last straw. There was no remorse given. If you would have asked the average US citizen in 1942-1945 if they should kill all japanese they can find, you might have very probably found a clear majority for a yes.
In the American mind of that time, the japanese were much worse than the Nazis. Given that most of this was because the public already knew about the terrible things that the japanese did to the people in South-East asia while most things the nazis did were not yet known to the public.
Also, by using the A-Bomb they killed approx. 200.000 japanese. By using a conventional invasion army, they would have lost probably more than 200.000 American GIs alone, not to speak of Millions of Japanese who would have run against the Americans with sticks and stones.
The A-Bomb was the only hope to show their fascist gouvernment that it's over for good. If they wouldn't capitulate, they would be wiped of the map.
So, I doubt that deploying the A-Bomb should cause any dissent in the country using it. Usually the gouvernments of that time, democracy or not, had very strict control over their medias (Yes, censorship was and is used widely in all countries, especially during war times) so that they would always be able to glorify the usage of the bomb, no matter what.